in

Scientists Claim To Have Had Evidence COVID-19 Was Man Made For A Year

For a year and a half anyone who claimed that COVID-19 was manufactured in a lab was silenced, and ridiculed. Now, investigations are taken seriously. Facebook at one time banned posts that supported the theory. The company has since reversed that policy. 

British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen are the authors of an explosive new study that claims Chinese scientists not only manufactured COVID 19, but then attempted to cover their tracks by by reverse engineering the virus to make it appear that it evolved from bats naturally over a period of time. The two Scientists concluded that COVID-19 has “no credible natural ancestor”.

Check out our Trump 2025 Calendars!

The 22 page paper was exclusively obtained by the Daily Mail. 

The scientists claim that they have had legitimate evidence of “retro engineering” in China for an entire year but were ignored by academics and the media. The pair wrote in their paper that “Chinese scientists took a natural coronavirus ‘backbone’ found in Chinese cave bats and spliced onto it a new ‘spike’, turning it into the deadly and highly transmissible COVID-19” according to the Daily Mail.

“Dalgleish is a professor of oncology at St George’s University, London, and is best known for his breakthrough creating the first working ‘HIV vaccine’, to treat diagnosed patients and allow them to go off medication for months.

Sørensen, a virologist, is chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, which developed a coronavirus vaccine candidate called Biovacc-19. Dalgleish also has share options in the firm.” The Daily Mail wrote.

The Daily Mail says that the study contains “Shocking allegations” of “deliberate” destruction, concealment, or contamination of data in Chinese laboratories. It also spoke of vocal scientists in China mysteriously disappearing. 

It is quite disheartening that for a year anyone who claimed that the virus may have been man made, was outcasted by their peers and the media. Now, there is a real possibility that those people were in fact correct.