Bret Baier, the notable face of Fox News known for his political analyses, was contemplating on a potential debate involving former President, Donald Trump. He highlighted that there was anticipation about a riveting discussion on Fox News that pitted the past president against his Democrat rival, Vice President Kamala Harris.
Interestingly, his remarks came during a candid reveal on the Hugh Hewitt’s radio show, wherein Baier hinted towards the prospect of Kamala Harris probably agreeing to a sincere round of debate on Fox News—although the consensus was that Trump didn’t share similar sentiments.
Given the charismatic persona and dynamic nature of the former president, Baier expressed his surprise sharing that Trump, who has usually never shyed away from a good debate, was of the opinion that it was not necessary to participate in yet another one.
Indeed, Baier’s insightful reflection brought out a unique aspect of Donald Trump’s approach towards further debates. Drawing on the former president’s magnetic charm, he used a vivid metaphor to explain his perspective.
Baier said, ‘Much like a powerful bug zapper in the backyard, the prospect of a wide 70 million viewership light would usually attract the past president. He wouldn’t resist the opportunity to engage, given he usually prefers to be at the center of these critical public affairs.’
Continuing his viewpoint, Baier shared, ‘Considering the erstwhile president’s persona and his campaign strategies, one would expect him to lean into such an opportunity especially if it is a platform like Fox that resonates with his beliefs.’
However, Baier sensed a shift in stance this time, ‘It appears the former president and his campaign aren’t too keen on moving past this viewpoint and are adopting a new line of thought.’ He then added, ‘Interestingly, the element of hesitation doesn’t stem from Harris or Fox, it indeed originates from the former president himself.’
In Baier’s assessment, he opined the decision to avoid a debate with Harris on Fox could be a ‘missed opportunity’ for the former president. Harnessing the power of Fox’s audience could give Trump a great platform to connect with his supporters and clarify his stand on multiple issues.
In the past, Trump has displayed his debating skills in a face-off with Harris on ABC. It was reported earlier that Trump had consented to a thoughtful discourse on Fox, but it wasn’t realized.
Following the ABC debate, Trump, in a post-debate analysis, teased Harris and dubbed her a ‘no-show’ for the initially agreed Fox debate. Further, underlining his decision, he reinforced in his characteristic fervor that ‘THERE WILL BE NO THIRD DEBATE!’
It is worth noting that although numerous pundits and results from public opinion polls indicated a preference for Harris in the first showdown, Trump confidently proclaimed victory. In true Trump style, he turned the tables of perception, casting the debate in a light that portrayed him most favorably.
Trump’s decision to avoid any further debates shouldn’t be seen as a reluctance to engage, but a strategic step. Recognizing that a debate won’t change the core beliefs of his strong base of supporters; rather he decided to engage with his constituents in ways most effective.
Perhaps Trump believes that his actions and decisions during his presidency spoke louder than any verbal debate. His leadership and policies are his true testimony, and these are the things that his followers still stand by strongly.
In conclusion, it should be understood that the decision to decline a further debate was not out of fear or hesitation, but a well thought out strategy. Trump’s decision to avoid the Fox debate has once again shown that he doesn’t adhere to the mainstream political playbook, but blazes a trail of his own.
While unwanted debates may be deemed unnecessary, Trump’s dedication to leading with action over words remains unquestionable. The former president can always be counted on to put his unique spin on things, and this stance on debates is just another example of that.