LISTEN HERE:
A debate on a bill to ban sex change procedures for minors in Nebraska derailed after a lawmaker shouted her support for transgender people. The legislation ultimately passed, and it also prohibits abortion after 12 weeks of pregnancy. Amidst disagreement, Democrat Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh banged a lectern and yelled that ‘Transgender people belong here, we need trans people, we love trans people.’
She strongly opposed the proposed restrictions and called out conservatives who voted in favor of them. Cavanaugh insisted her colleagues live with the consequences of their vote as she would passionately continue advocating for minority rights. Her outburst lasted under one minute.
Off the back of a filibuster, Republican lawmakers attained enough support to pass the bill with both measures. Governor Jim Pillen, who’d taken steps to ensure enough backing, pledged to sign it into law.
This legislation wouldn’t allow transgender people under 19 to undergo gender surgery, with a few exceptions, and would entrust the state’s chief medical officer to dictate rules for hormone treatments and puberty blockers for transgender minors. The bill includes exclusions for minors already receiving treatment before the law comes into effect. Exceptions for rape and incest will also apply to the 12-week abortion ban.
The vote in Nebraska sees it join at least 17 other states that have passed or are debating laws banning transgender hormone therapy, procedures and therapies for minors lately. Proposals for restrictions are even awaiting sanction from governors in Texas and Missouri. North Carolina recently passed a 12-week abortion ban, one of myriad measures applied in states following the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling’s repeal by the US Supreme Court last year.
Unsurprisingly, most Republicans in Nebraska voiced approval of the measures during the debate held on Friday. State Sen. Steve Erdman compared Democrats views on abortion to justifying rape. He decried the assertion that treating abortion as healthcare was like saying being raped qualifies as lovemaking. The bill’s passing cements stronger regulation on transgender medical procedures and abortions in the state.
While the legislation has raised voices on the Democratic side, Republicans believe it’s a significant milestone for protecting unborn babies’ lives. The support from the Nebraska Legislature is in-line with the pro-life platform that continues to garner favor with Republicans nationally. This move surely brings relief to conservative lawmakers, particularly in the wake of other states like New Mexico and Virginia adopting more liberal, lenient policies on the issue in modern times. While the debate rages on about these matters, the law has spoken on this issue for Nebraska.
It is apparent that the lawmakers goal is to refer the matter of business back to the medical community. The medical community would be trusted with the power of informed decisions as parents, and they would go to the experts. Medical professionals are equipped with the knowledge required to make the most informed decisions about the course of action for individuals seeking treatment. It appears as if the community has lost faith in the medical community’s ability to provide the care individuals require.
It is the state’s responsibility to protect the rights of all citizens within its borders, especially the vulnerable. The bill is being introduced to accomplish that goal, protecting minors from making irreversible decisions that could impact them negatively later in life. The state feels a duty to intervene to prevent the potential for any adverse detrimental consequences. The law aims to protect the young individuals from feeling regretful, protecting the sanctity of life and aiding fellow citizens.
There’s no doubt that policymakers and lawmakers have a tough job — they gather opinions and sentiments, and every decision made has a real-world impact. This decision ensures that children don’t have to struggle with regret or despair as a result of decisions made before they were old enough to start comprehending the weight of their actions. The problematic nature of this issue is why so many are fighting passionately on both sides of the aisle. However, it’s worth applauding the lawmakers’ fortitude, who opted to take the steps they deemed necessary to protect the state’s youth.
Despite the controversy surrounding the bill, there’s no doubting that a minor deserves to go through a process that will allow them to lead a fulfilling and comprehensive life. Lobbyists for the transgender community see any intervention or perceived oppression as harmful and contributing to a culture with dangerous implications that make it difficult for individuals to seek out the services they need. The reality is that the transgender community in Nebraska, along with other states with similar laws, needs to be well-researched and well-reported in the medical community and within knowledgeable individuals’ circles.
The consequences of a decision not to implement the measures could be dire. Measures and regulations that prevent unscrupulous medical professionals and quacks from preying on the vulnerable, ought to be put in place. Sadly, the medical community continues to face pushback from communities opposed to the legislation. It is worth noting that the medical community is non-partisan — the politics ends when the patient leaves the office. During a time when the country is grappling with many other challenges, it’s crucial we trust the medical community to make informed decisions.
It’s no secret that a discussion of this nature often creates uncomfortable conversations. However, to implement change, change that protects the most vulnerable in our society, difficult conversations must take place. Encounters that give individuals the opportunity to challenge their beliefs and come out with fresh perspectives — perspectives which are usually more inclusive and compassionate, given time and thought. One cannot overstate the positive effect difficult, but well-meaning, conversations can have on making the world a better place.
Initial opinions on any act introduced have the potential to change through careful consideration, examination of the underlying details, and conversation. However, even a piece of legislation with the best intentions will face criticism and opposition. Critics across the country have voiced that this law goes against their values. A part of any vibrant democracy is that everyone has the right to voice their opinion. As reported during the bill’s debate on Friday, most Republicans backed the proposed bill. It stands to reason that more than half the constituents of Nebraska also share similar sentiments.
It is important to note that while the debate is framed in a political battleground and has quite rightly gotten the attention of lawmakers and legal professionals, the minor subjects in this case ultimately impact ordinary families. Ordinary people who are seeking genuine understanding and the opportunity to lead fulfilling lives. Introducing measures that protect minors who are still not old enough to make their own potentially life-altering decisions is a responsible option that should be explored by all states. The legislation may be viewed as a tradeoff between the rights of young people and the socio-political climate. Still, ultimately, it is a measure aimed at establishing balance.
It is worth stating that reasonable individuals can disagree about the subject’s intricacies and merits. However, if the laws that come out of these debates and discussions protect the vulnerable, who may not necessarily be able to exercise their rights, then it is something worth fighting for. There is a potential to find common ground, particularly for lawmakers who are passionate about safeguarding the sanctity of life and those who wish to offer a compassionate approach to individuals who are still coming to terms with who they are — a balance can, and should, be achieved.
It is the responsibility of the medical community to keep the public informed, help parents navigate the legislative landscape, and ensure the safety and well-being of minors across the country. This legislation, as contentious as it may be, sets a firm stance by the state, for a commitment to protecting the most vulnerable in society. This is a promising step for Nebraska and the United States in general. For those who are concerned about the bill’s political implications, it’s worth noting that its primary goal is to protect the minors’ health and safety.
The decision and approval of the bill have spurred much debate and opposition from LGBT groups and certain liberal factions. Despite this, it’s important to remember the goal of this legislation is to protect young people. All stakeholders should keep the conversation going and avail themselves of pertinent information. The changes planned can only successfully transpire when all the involved actors, including the medical community, parents, and lawmakers, work towards educating society, eliminating apathy, and dismantling misleading or inaccurate depictions of the law’s impact. This way, the measures and policies can work for everyone involved.
