in

US Court Upholds Bribery Allegation Against NYC Mayor Eric Adams

A decision was announced by a U.S. federal court, refusing to drop a bribery allegation from a quintuple charge indictment against Eric Adams, the current Mayor of New York City. The claim under scrutiny involves the accusation that Adams, a Democrat, received privileges such as expensive trips from an official of Turkey in return for an advantageous building inspection.

The ruling came from U.S. District Judge Dale Ho. Rebuffing the case put forward by Adams’s defense team, the judge maintained the validity of the charge. The defense had made reference to a Supreme Court resolution in June which absolved a prior mayor of Indiana charged with graft.

Check out our Trump 2025 Calendars!

Adams’s legal representatives contended that the Mayor contacting the fire commissioner concerning safety approval for a building owned by Turkish individuals didn’t amount to any form of reciprocal transaction. However, Judge Ho contended otherwise expressing that the question of if Adams took advantage of his official position as Brooklyn Borough President to sway the Fire Department of New York, is a matter left for a jury to discern.

Judge Ho outlined his judgement in the written ruling stating that it’ll ultimately rely on a jury to determine whether Adams misused his authority in his capacity as Brooklyn Borough President to influence the FDNY. This legal setback comes at a crucial juncture, with the upcoming inauguration of the President-elect, Donald Trump.

Amid this development, Adams has turned to Donald Trump, the next occupant of the presidential office, who could potentially grant him a presidential pardon. In what seems like a strategic move, he recently endowed Trump with the label of a ‘great patriot’, despite previously casting assertions of racism on the President-elect amongst other disparaging comments.

Following Trump’s statement that he would ‘definitely’ contemplate pardoning the man who likened himself to the ‘Biden of Brooklyn’, this praise from Adams appears timely. The NYC Mayor, through the course of the 2024 campaign, showed restraint in his criticisms of Trump.

Interestingly, Adams, an ex-Republican, and Trump share a similar standpoint regarding the controversial topic of illegal immigration. The Mayor of New York has insinuated that his legal troubles may stem from being targeted politically owing to his strong stance against unauthorized immigration.

This viewpoint seems to strike a chord with Trump and his following, who perceive the justice system as being manipulated for political ends. They believe Trump, akin to Adams, is on the receiving end of an unjust political offensive.

If there is no presidential intervention with a pardon, the trial for Adams is due to commence in April 2025. The allegations pressed against him describe the acceptance of perks exceeding $90,000 in value from Turkish officials, offered in exchange for political benefits.

Furthermore, Adams is facing two charges of request for a campaign contribution from a foreign national, alongside one count of wire fraud and a count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. These mounting accusations against the serving Mayor have sparked calls for him to step down.

Despite the clamor for his resignation in light of his indictment, Adams intends to pursue his political career by aiming for reelection. The controversy, however, has opened up questions about his potential shift in party allegiance.

When subjected to the query of whether he was contemplating a switch to the Republican Party in the recent past, Adams left all possibilities open. He did not dismiss the proposition, elliptically stating instead, ‘I’m part of the American party.’

The considerable gravity of these allegations begins to raise questions around the future of Adams’s political career and how it may shape not only his political affiliation but also his political strategy moving forward.

Only time would tell what fate has in store for the Mayor, whether he will continue to hold his position, switch political affiliations, or find respite in an anticipated presidential pardon.