in , ,

Trust in The Candidates: CBS Puts Fact-Checking in Vice-Presidential Debate on Frontline Duty

JD Vance & Tim Walz
This combination of images shows Republican vice presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, at left in Erie, Pa., Aug. 28, 2024, and Democratic vice presidential candidate Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz speaking at the DNC in Chicago, Aug. 21, 2024, in Chicago. (AP Photo)

The forthcoming vice-presidential debate will take on a new dynamic, with CBS News handing the task of fact-checking to the two contenders, JD Vance and Tim Walz. The network plans to let the candidates call out false claims themselves during the 90-minute debate, which is slated to begin at 9 p.m. Eastern time next Tuesday in a studio located in Manhattan. The duel will be moderated by the departing anchor of ‘CBS Evening News’ alongside the host of ‘Face the Nation’.

Earlier in the month, the broadcasting network ABC hosted the biting debate between President Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. During this event, ABC’s vigilant moderators flagged four instances of inaccurate statements made by Trump, while Harris’s remarks went unchallenged. This, understandably, caused an uproar among the camp of Trump and his highly committed supporters who cried foul over what they viewed as apparent bias.

Support Trump NOW with this FREE FLAG!

A similar situation arose during a CNN-hosted event last spring that placed Trump head-to-head with President Joe Biden. In this instance, CNN moderators refrained from questioning any facts presented by the candidates. Critics speculated that Biden’s lackluster performance in this unmoderated debate contributed to his subsequent exit from the race.

In its upcoming session, CBS News plans to put the responsibility of pointing out inaccuracies squarely on the shoulders of Vance and Walz themselves. The moderators will create room during rebuttal time to enable the candidates to challenge each other’s statements freely. This approach by CBS suggests a desire to distance itself from the acrimony of picking apart candidates’ claims, perhaps hoping to mitigate similar controversies to those that befell its counterparts, ABC and CNN.

To complement this strategy, CBS has engaged its own team of fact-checkers to provide real-time accuracy review during the live debate. In their post-debate analysis, these fact-checkers will also dissect the critical points of this political discourse and analyze the veracity of the candidates’ statements. This innovation ensures the public gets a thorough understanding of the facts aired during the debate.

However, critics argue that offstage fact-review measures don’t necessarily reach all those who view the event in real time. Some are concerned that these checks, happening behind the scenes, may not fully serve viewers seeking immediate accuracy from their elected officials.

In contrast to the two preceding presidential debates, an agreement has been reached for the vice-presidential hopefuls to have their microphones kept live throughout their opponent’s speech. This becomes an opportunity for spontaneous exchanges and heartfelt dialogue between Vance and Walz, albeit with the potential for unchecked interruptions or talking over each other.

Nevertheless, CBS reserves the authority to intervene in the event of a disruptive ‘hot mic’, in order to ensure a balanced and professional dialogue. This way, the spirit of fairness and decorum is given priority, and the viewers are served the respect they deserve.

Each participant will be allowed two minutes to share their closing remarks which provide an opportunity to highlight their key points and ready voters for the bigger battle to come. The honor of delivering the final word will fall to Vance, who won this privilege in a virtual coin toss.

This debate marks a significant milestone in CBS News’s political coverage. Like it did for the presidential face-offs, CBS News will be providing its feed to other television networks for wider broadcast. As with previous debates, recognising the importance of the event to the electorate’s decision-making.

In terms of the debate location, Vance and Walz will face off in a West Side studio void of a live audience. Given the technologically advanced times we live in, this nod to social distancing will not put a damper on the reach and influence of their message.

However, it remains undisclosed whether President Trump and Kamala Harris will share a stage again before Election Day on November 5th. Harris has agreed to partake in another round of grueling debate set for October 23, but it’s uncertain if Trump will delight voters by joining her.

In a recent poll released earlier this week, the public emphasized their desire to see the two opposite poles face-off again. The poll showed a marked two-to-one margin of likely voters expressing their eagerness for an encore to this crucial political tête-à-tête.

Ultimately, it’s clear that American voters are hungry for information and clarity about their future leadership. Whether it’s through an anticipated face-off between current leaders or a heated vice-presidential debate, the public’s demand for transparent and accountable leadership is clear.

Looking forward, these series of debates, regardless of the controversies and critiques they carry, are crucial in shaping America’s future. They offer voters a chance to scrutinize their prospective leaders, gauge their preparedness for office, and understand where they stand on critical issues affecting their country.