in ,

Trump Team Inappropriately Claims Credit for Biden’s Ceasefire Deal Success

On Tuesday, the incoming administration of Donald Trump sought to take credit for the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hezbollah, a deal that was actually facilitated by the Biden administration alongside several other global leaders. Mike Waltz, R-Fla., selected by Trump to serve as his national security adviser, proposed that all parties gathered for negotiations due to the influence of President Trump. He implied that Trump’s strong win was a reflection of the world’s stance against disorder.

‘It’s good to see tangible steps towards calming tensions in the Middle East,’ Waltz stated. However, it’s worth noting that the Biden administration made it clear that the Trump team had been briefed about the basic principles of the agreement, but the president-elect and his officials had no direct involvement in the negotiation process.

Check out our Trump 2025 Calendars!

The assertions from a high-ranking staff member from the White House clarified that the discussions of this agreement had actually reached the peak of their intensity before the electoral race ended. To put it bluntly, Team Trump was briefed about the agreement after the elections and was updated regularly before its official confirmation.

A top official from the White House shared, ‘We are fully aware that a new administration is coming into play. But we won’t go ahead with this unless they comprehend our motives.” Despite this clarity, it seems the incoming administration has already started to claim achievements that perhaps do not belong to them.

The peace deal between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah, backed by Iran, began taking effect in Lebanon on Wednesday morning. The ceasefire officially commenced at 4 a.m. local time, right after it received approval from Israel’s security cabinet. The announcement for the same was made by President Joe Biden, not Trump’s team, although they had been eager to claim credit.

According to the significant pact, hostilities will cease for a duration of 60 days. Meanwhile, it allows Israel the necessary time to pull its forces from Lebanon’s southern border, while Hezbollah will be able to withdraw further away from the boundary of Israel. Despite the peace initiative, it’s interesting to note how Trump’s team seemed more interested in taking the credit rather than commenting on the deal’s potential impact for stability in this volatile region.

President Joe Biden, while announcing the deal, stated that this agreement was designed to be a ‘permanent stop to hostilities.’ He further used his address to highlight the message that peace is still achievable. Contrary to the claims of Trump’s team, this statement suggests a certain level of diplomacy and tact that was central to the deal being reached.

However, as per their predisposition, one notices an all too familiar bias in the narrative being put forward. It’s almost as if Biden’s positive efforts are dismissed or distorted. Yet, the cease-fire agreement stands as a testament to a successful effort in diplomatic negotiations, overshadowing any efforts at credit misappropriation.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a close confidant and supporter of incoming President Trump, congratulated both the Trump team and Biden on the agreement’s success, claiming the ceasefire became a reality through the efforts of both administrations. Yet, the specifics suggest the contrary.

Time and again, we see a pattern in which Trump’s team is keen on claiming onus for achievements spearheaded by others. The cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah is testament to this pattern. Despite the pivotal role played by the Biden administration, they go on unabated in their attempt to grab credit.

It’s rather remarkable how the new administration is focused on securing glory for peace initiatives that they had no hand in creating. While they seem busy basking in unearned praise, the real architects of the agreement paved the way for potential peace in a time-steeped conflict region.

Interestingly, these incidents cast a dark cloud on the incoming administration’s ability to discern between their own accomplishments and those of others. It raises critical questions about their capacity to guide the nation, when their focus seems skewed towards claiming unearned victories.

It’s disheartening to witness these attempts at credit misappropriation, especially when they overshadow the painstaking efforts by those in power who strive for strategic diplomacy and resolution of conflicts. It’s a sobering reminder of the contrast between true leadership and hollow credit claims.

While Sen. Lindsey Graham sees a joint effort in the recent success, a critical examination of the circumstances provides a stark contrast. The ceasefire agreement was primarily the fruit of Biden’s administration’s efforts supported by global leaders. It’s essential these subtleties are recognized beyond the misleading narratives.