in

Texas Senate Acquits Attorney General Ken Paxton of Impeachment Charges

LISTEN HERE:

The Texas Senate has rendered their verdict on the 16 articles of impeachment lodged against Ken Paxton, the Attorney General of Texas. After a night of careful deliberation, Senators reconvened in the Texas Senate chamber promptly at 10:30 AM CST.

Finally, at approximately 11:10 AM CST, the long-awaited vote took place. To the relief of many, the Texas Senate has acquitted Paxton of the impeachment charges. The closing arguments from both sides in the impeachment trial took place on day nine, attended by Paxton himself.

During the trial, Rep. Andrew Murr (R-Junction) presented a ten-minute argument, claiming that Paxton had surrendered the authority of the attorney general’s office to a private citizen, enabling them to launch attacks against perceived adversaries.

Murr further contended that Paxton should have heeded the advice of the knowledgeable senior staffers, whom he called the “best and the brightest,” when they advised against assisting real estate developer Nate Paul.

In response to Murr’s statement, attorneys Tony Buzbee and Dan Cogdell passionately defended Paxton, asserting that the impeachment effort was a retaliatory move orchestrated by the Bushes following Paxton’s victory over George P. Bush in the 2022 primary for attorney general.

Support Trump NOW with this FREE FLAG!

Additionally, Buzbee argued that the $25,000 campaign contribution made to Paxton in 2018 could not be construed as a bribe, as it occurred two years prior to Paxton’s actions.

The defense team also alleged that Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan (R-Beaumont) initiated the impeachment proceedings after Paxton called for Phelan’s impeachment, which stemmed from a controversial video depicting Phelan supposedly intoxicated while presiding over the House.

Lastly, Buzbee refuted the accusations that Paul provided home renovations as a quid pro quo for the attorney general’s assistance, deeming them unfounded and misconstrued rumors.

Please note that this is an evolving story, and further updates will follow. We strive to keep you well-informed with the latest developments.

Texan conservatives were closely watching as the Texas Senate reached a verdict on the articles of impeachment against their Attorney General, Ken Paxton. After extensive deliberation and overnight contemplation, Senators convened in the Texas Senate chamber promptly at 10:30 AM CST for the final judgment. At approximately 11:10 AM CST, the pivotal vote was cast.

Ultimately, Texas conservatives could breathe a sigh of relief: Paxton was cleared of all the impeachment charges brought against him. The drama unfolded during the ninth day of the impeachment trial, which was attended by Paxton himself.

Representative Andrew Murr (R-Junction) engaged in a ten-minute impassioned argument, accusing Paxton of relinquishing the power of the attorney general’s office to a private citizen, thereby enabling malicious attacks on perceived adversaries.

Murr asserted that Paxton should have heeded the wisdom of his senior staff members, whom he hailed as the “best and the brightest,” when they warned against assisting real estate developer Nate Paul.

Responding to Murr’s closing statement, attorneys Tony Buzbee and Dan Cogdell fervently came to Paxton’s defense, suggesting that the impeachment efforts were driven by the Bushes as retribution for Paxton’s triumph over George P. Bush in the 2022 primary election for attorney general.

Furthermore, Buzbee argued that a $25,000 campaign contribution made to Paxton in 2018 could not be deemed a bribe, as it occurred two years before Paxton’s alleged wrongdoing. The defense team also contended that Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan (R-Beaumont) acted out of personal offense when Paxton called for his impeachment following viral footage showing Phelan purportedly inebriated while presiding over the House.

Finally, Buzbee dispelled the accusations that Paul financed home renovations in exchange for Paxton’s legal assistance, dismissing them as baseless and misinterpreted rumors.

As this story continues to develop, we remain committed to providing you with the most recent updates.

After extensive deliberation, the Texas Senate has delivered its verdict on the numerous articles of impeachment brought against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Beginning at 10:30 AM CST, Senators gathered in the esteemed Texas Senate chamber to determine the outcome of this high-profile case. At approximately 11:10 AM CST, the crucial vote was taken.

Favorably for Paxton, the Texas Senate has acquitted him of all charges leveled against him in this impeachment proceeding. Bringing the ninth day of the trial to a close, Paxton attended the proceedings and heard the final arguments from both sides.

Representative Andrew Murr (R-Junction) took the floor and delivered a compelling ten-minute argument, alleging that Paxton improperly delegated the attorney general’s office to a private citizen who subsequently used it to target their political opponents.

Murr also contended that Paxton should have heeded the advice of his experienced senior staff, affectionately referred to as the “best and the brightest,” who advised against assisting real estate developer Nate Paul.

To counter Murr’s statements, attorneys Tony Buzbee and Dan Cogdell staunchly defended Paxton. They fervently claimed that the impeachment was a calculated move by the Bushes in retaliation for Paxton’s victory over George P. Bush in the 2022 primary election for attorney general.

Moreover, Buzbee argued that a $25,000 campaign contribution made to Paxton back in 2018 cannot be considered a bribe, as it predates Paxton’s alleged misconduct by two years. Additionally, the defense team alleged that Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan (R-Beaumont) initiated the impeachment proceedings after Paxton called for Phelan’s impeachment, citing an incident where viral footage allegedly depicted Phelan under the influence while presiding over the House.

Finally, Buzbee dismissed accusations that Paul financed home renovations in exchange for Paxton’s assistance, asserting that these claims were unfounded and stemmed from misunderstood speculation.