LISTEN HERE:
Thursday marked an eventful day in political discourse as the esteemed senators, Ted Cruz of Texas and Marco Rubio of Florida, raised the curtain on their latest legislative feat. The bill, colored overtly with conservative hues, serves to actively discourage federal agencies and personnel from employing the term ‘Latinx’ in official documentation.
This move is a mirror reflection of similar legislation that was previously pitched in the House of Representatives. Leveraging the essence of respect for Hispanic Americans, the two senators, well-known figures on the political battlefield, have anchored this new policy under the moniker of ‘Respect for Hispanic Americans Act.’
The policy’s sister act in the House of Representatives bears the title of ‘Reject Latinx Act’. The credit for this passionate endeavor goes to Rep. María Elvira Salazar, who represents the great state of Florida.
This bill was conceived and birthed in the current Congress, through which it called for the identical prohibition of the term ‘Latinx.’ Concrete standpoints based on conservative perspectives were galore on this day.
Sen. Cruz, unflinching in his commitment towards the Hispanic Americans, spoke of the general disdain for the contentious term ‘Latinx’ amongst this community. ‘Woke activists promoting far-fetched terminologies such as ‘Latinx’ have no place in our federal operations’, stated Cruz, critiquing the predominant woke culture.
He emphasized on the need for the government to stand its ground and not bend to these influences. He went on to express his pride over collaborating with Sen. Rubio in striving to maintain the sanctity of official government communication.
Standing alongside Cruz, Rubio voiced a similar sentiment. His words hit hard at the artificially woke narrative being thrust upon Hispanic Americans. Latino heritage doesn’t require the imposition of counterfeit woke terminology, stated Rubio passionately.
He seconded the notion that the term ‘Latinx’ is essentially a degradation, casually thrown around by left-leaning elites with disregard for the Hispanic populace.
The bill introduced by the bipartisan duo of Cruz and Rubio prohibits the use of the term ‘Latinx’ in all forms of federal correspondences. This legislative piece is a bold echo of the decree condemning the word ‘Latinx’ signed by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders into state law.
The Republican governor from Arkansas, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, is known for her firm stance against the term ‘Latinx.’ She welcomed the move with enthusiastic applause, resonating her support widely on the digital platform of Twitter.
She stated that this terminology is largely confined to academic institutions and corporations swaying towards woke philosophy, far removed from the everyday lexicon of the ordinary Hispanic citizen.
As we visit the origins of the ‘Reject Latinx Act’, we find Rep. Salazar unveiling the bill in April. She held the Biden administration responsible for instigating a woke onslaught on Hispanic identity.
According to Salazar, the administration was guilty of aggressively promoting the use of the term ‘Latinx’, a clear digression from the authentic Latino ethos.
Salazar further warned against the Biden administration’s perceptible strategy of weaponizing White House communication tools. She condemned the administration’s attempts to tamper with Hispanic language and culture, while enforcing progressive ideologies.
Her opposition to this ideological imposition resonates with conservative values, providing an outlet for shared frustrations.
The term ‘Latinx’ has been advocated by the Biden administration with the benign intention of inclusivity. However, this term has struggled to find acceptance, let alone adoption, within the Latin American community.
The key reason being the perception of this terminology as an amplified symbol of alien, woke culture.
Salazar’s office provided a straightforward definition of ‘Latinx,’ deeming it as a ‘woke creation of the neo-Marxist left.’
This Orwellian label, they stressed, should never be the reference point for anyone of Hispanic or Latin American descent. The conservative tenor resonating throughout this political narrative is clear and unmistakable.
The term ‘Latinx’ has been widely rebutted by the Hispanic population in the United States. Representing the sentiments of many, Salazar’s press release acknowledged ‘Latinx’ as offensive and patronizing. It cited surveys undertaken over recent years projecting the unfamiliarity and disapproval of the term among Latin Americans.
Reflecting the growing aversion towards the term ‘Latinx’, the press release emphasized that most Latinos in the United States are oblivious of it, with many never even having heard the term. However, this insensitivity only scratches the surface.
The unwillingness to use or adopt it only underscores the existing divide between the awakened elites and the common man.
Echoing similar anti-Latinx sentiments in the House of Representatives, bills similar to the ‘Reject Latinx Act’ have been introduced. Lawmakers have time and again reiterated the need to maintain the linguistic and cultural integrity of the Hispanic community in federal documentation.
Among the notable co-sponsors of these legislation pieces are Representatives Byron Donalds, Alex Mooney, Jeff Van Drew, Tony Gonzales, Carlos Giménez, and Burgess Owens. These representatives, symbols of a united Republican front, have pledged to protect the Hispanic identity from neo-progressive terminologies.
Without doubt, this moment in American history has witnessed a resurgence of conservative sentiment. The ban on ‘Latinx’ – a term seen as imposed and alien by much of the Hispanic community – has become a rallying cry against the imposition of an ideological and political agenda on language and identity.
The stance taken by these conservative legislators is a reflection of their commitment to preserving the resonances of traditional linguistics and respecting the sentiments of Hispanic Americans.