Biden Was Seen ‘Visibly Shaking’, Could Not Get Into SUV On His Own

Last week, the President, was sighted exhibiting a certain degree of physical discomfort, as per accounts published in the Daily Mail. On disembarking from Air Force One, he appeared somewhat unsteady which understandably raised eyebrows among observers.

In the early morning hours just prior to dawn, he was reported to have some difficulty stepping up into the SUV that was waiting to deliver him to the sprawling Santa Barbara estate he and his family had just visited for a week. This information was all the more intriguing considering the President had allegedly been awake for nearly an entire day when this incident occurred.

Those present noted that the First Lady seemed perturbed by her husband’s visible exertion. The sight of her concern was telling, offering an unspoken acknowledgement that there may be underlying issues at play.

This recent episode represents yet another instance in a growing list of instances where the President’s physical capacities have been called into question. Of particular concern is his balance – the President has experienced a few falls since beginning his tenure.

Furthermore, this incident follows on the heels of other impactful events within the political sphere. Specifically, the President’s party seemed eager to distance itself from him post a lackluster performance in a key debate against the Republican presidential nominee. This signifies a potential loss of faith in the President’s leadership capabilities among his own allies.

An expert voice weighed in on the matter as well. Dr. Tom Pitts, a celebrated neurologist holding four board certifications and known Democratic supporter, spoke with NBC News after the debated and proposed a medical explanation for the President’s behavior.

Dr. Pitts pointed out that the President might be showing symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, a neurodegenerative condition affecting movement. According to him, the diagnosis wasn’t difficult to arrive at, testament to the severity of the symptoms.

Calling attention to the signature indicators of the disease, Pitts enumerates them: limited movement, muscular stiffness, lack of facial expression and issues with speech. He even goes as far to say that a medical student would be expected to make this diagnosis based on these distinctive symptoms.

Parkinson’s, according to Pitts, seems to be a plausible explanation for the President’s physical symptoms, as these symptoms appear to be deteriorating in line with progress typical of neurodegenerative outset. A state of affairs he describes as Parkinsonisms.

The neurologist also highlights an unaddressed concern: there is an ongoing degeneration of brain tissue. Pitts makes this statement with clarity and emphasis, stating it to be an indisputable fact.

Dr. Pitts challenges the skeptics with a simple request: produce the MRI. He believes that this definitive evidence would either confirm or deny his diagnosis based on the physical evidence presented by the imaging.

His daring call to put your money where your mouth is, refocuses the conversation on the need for transparency and open dialogue about the President’s health status. After all, the viability and success of leadership, Pitts suggests, fundamentally hinges on health.

But this triumphant call does not dismiss the seriousness of the suggestion. If true, it points to a condition that is chronic and irreversible, marking a notable shift in the narrative around the President’s leadership.

Nonetheless, these observations, while severe, remain speculative until official medical records or evaluations can either corroborate or refute them. The importance of this diagnosis, if confirmed, would surely create waves within the political landscape.

In conclusion, the President’s physical comportment continues to be under scrutiny. Whether these assertions are valid or mere partisan projections will be uncovered with time, evidence and transparency.

Meanwhile, this occurrence has engendered a variety of reactions ranging from concern to skepticism. It remains to be seen how these developments will impact the political landscape and the public’s view of the President’s capacity to lead effectively.