The senators of the Show-Me State approved an amendment to their constitution aimed at exclusively reserving the right to vote for U.S. citizens and prohibiting the use of ranked-choice voting methodology. The bill, referred to as SJR 78, awaits scrutiny by the House of Missouri. Passing muster here will pave the way to a place on the ballot in November.
The salient feature of the amendment clearly states that only U.S. citizens of 18 years or more, residing in Missouri or any political partition thereof, intending to cast their vote, will be granted the right to participate in any election. The language of the bill is very specific in its requirements.
The amendment asserts that all elections are to be carried out using either paper ballots or any other legally acceptable mechanical means. The bill contains further stipulations regarding voting; each voter is allowed only one vote per issue. It maintains that the number of votes cast for offices should match the respective number of positions available.
The amendment establishes crystal-clear guidelines around the voting process. Under no circumstance is a voter allowed to rank candidates while casting their vote for a particular office. A system favoring the candidate who achieves the greatest number of votes in a party primary seems to be the direction they’re heading in.
Laying out further constitutional pretense, the bill specifies that the candidate who secures the most votes from their party’s primary will be the sole candidate representing that political party during the general election. The name of the selected candidate will then find a place on the official general election ballot, unless they are removed or replaced following the legal framework.
Spencer Bone, the Executive Director of Liberty Alliance USA, outlined the threat Missouri faces each year from the Left’s quest to manipulate the electoral process. He delivered strong words on the strategies used by left-wing activists to disrupt the existing political structure, to ensure the voice of conservatives is silenced.
Bone lauded the Senate’s affirmative action on SJR 78 as vital progress in intercepting the Left’s intention to upend elections. He openly championed the need for the House to mirror the Senate’s stance. The urgency for the House to retain the established position and complete the task at hand was powerfully emphasized.
Jason Snead, serving as Executive Director of the Honest Elections Project Action and leader of the Stop RCV Coalition, vocally paralleled Bone’s sentiment. He too pointed out the relentless attempts by progressive groups to infuse ranked-choice voting and non-citizen voting into the electoral process, with sights set on skewing American politics leftward.
Snead commended the Senate’s bold countermeasure to face these issues head-on, thereby directly representing the will of the people of Missouri. He was skeptical about the optimistic picture painted around ranked-choice voting, voicing strong reservations on its implementation.
He expressed concerns that ranked-choice voting would precipitate unwelcomed complications rather than resolving existing ones. Snead opined that introducing such a model threatens to befuddle voters and imposes additional responsibilities on election officials, complicating their duties.
Snead further questioned the authenticity and readability of election results under such voting system, hinting at increased difficulty in their comprehension and credibility. His observations were based on evidence from cities across the country that attempted, and subsequently repealed, ranked-choice voting due to its inherent complexity and confusion.
Highlighting the enormous financial backing from the nation’s left-wing patrons, Snead indicated that self-serving interests are working tirelessly to modify election rules. He laid out his argument against the inception of ranked-choice voting and non-citizen voting, seeing them as selfish strategies to tilt the political balance.
For an in-depth critique on the perils of adopting ranked-choice voting, readers may explore further with the suggested reference. The recurring dialogue on fair and transparent elections continues amidst the contesting views of different political factions.
In sum, the Missouri Senate’s decision signals strategic steps towards redefining voting rules. As debates and discussions around issues of citizenship and voting structure continue, the bill clearly sets a precedent for the consideration of measures ensuring the sanctity of the democratic process.