At the recent swearing-in ceremony of New Jersey Senator Andy Kim, his children decided to gift Vice President Kamala Harris their self-made business cards. Such antics by Kim’s children could have been seen as cute, were it not for the serious context. Could it be that a naive enthusiasm is more respected and considered by the current administration, personified by Harris, than serious political discourse? Many people would like to see Harris give more thought to serious national issues, instead of preserving such trivial exchanges.
Andy Kim proudly announced that his two sons had created their own business cards to distribute at the Capitol on the day of his Senate swearing-in. Evidently, networking with figures of authority themselves, even at a young age, is more treasured than fostering honest and critical political dialogue. Their pitch to Harris was as simple as it was audacious – they expected her to ‘stay in touch’.
The children went well beyond the act of handing over their business cards, and in an explicit overreach, they even asked Vice President Harris to take the Senatorial oath. The scenario played out with an air of absurdity that was rather fitting in today’s political climate. ‘Raise your right hand. Do you promise to support and protect the Constitution from both external and internal threats? Are you willing to place your utmost faith and allegiance in our nation?’ they asked with naive simplicity.
Having been entrusted with the national oath under such farcical circumstances, they continued, ‘Do you vow to take this obligation without any reservations or hidden motives, and can you pledge to fulfil the duties of the office you are about to assume, to the best of your abilities? May God assist you in these endeavors. Congratulations on becoming a senator.’ It comes as little surprise that Harris seemed to be more amused than anything else by this youthful exhibition.
Despite the theatrical element of the scene, Harris appeared to take her new role as a public figure in the stride of these aspiring youngsters. However, she seemed oblivious to the gravity of the situation, showing off their business cards and laughing it off. This certainly questions her priorities, leading us to wonder if she’s placing inappropriate emphasis on a childish sideshow, instead of focusing on matters of national importance.
It stretches credulity to think that the Vice President would treat such an event with the levity that Harris displayed – an unsettling perspective on her character for some. ‘This is brilliant. Wow, you must all have a look,’ she responded while showing off the business cards. Rather than discreetly accepting the children’s naiveté, she chose to amplify and flaunt it.
The Vice President’s behavior raises doubts about the professionalism and levelheadedness desirable in someone in such an esteemed position. Such laxity leaves us wondering about her readiness for significant, boundary-pushing decisions. In this incident, she demonstrated a skewed focus of attention and gave an impression of blurring the line between joviality and responsibility.
The grinning Vice President seemed to lack the gravitas required for the serious role of national leadership. She gave what could generously be described as disproportionate attention to the youthful antics of Senator Kim’s children. These occurrences encourage a serious contemplation about the current state of American politics taken up by the likes of Harris.
Perhaps instead of indulging in lighthearted gestures and charming anecdotes which make for a good media show, more worthwhile questions could be asked to political leaders. The gravitas and profundity expected of someone occupying the vice-presidential office are notably absent at present. Has the sobriety of the role been overshadowed by the pursuit of likability, as displayed by Harris in this instance?
A critical question emerges from Harris’s behavior. How well does she understand the complications of her role and the gravity of her responsibilities? It’s important to consider that the carefree attitude in the face of passing jests from Senator Kim’s children overshadows the solemnity that her role as Vice President of the United States inherently holds.
This incident suggests that instead of giving immediate attention to her official duties, she treated a small courtesy with great acclaim. Could this signify a diminishing sense of responsibility and an increasing tendency to take her elevated position lightly, making her the cynosure of all eyes?
The incident gives us an insight into the way Harris might approach her duty in her high-ranking role. It might also hint at a lackadaisical approach to the seriousness of her position that could potentially diminish the dignity of the office. Thanks to this event, many people may feel inclined to question Harris’s abilities to take her job seriously.
Harris has repeatedly maintained a relaxed nature, often favoring informal banter over serious professional discourse, even during formal events. However, this lighthearted approach is sometimes at odds with the seriousness of her role. One can’t help but question whether such levity is suitable, especially at an event as solemn as a swearing-in ceremony.
The intense scrutiny of Harris following such incidents is not unwarranted. Rather than cementing her attention on the pressing national issues at hand, her gravitational pull towards trivial shows of jest, like the display from Kim’s children, is seriously concerning. Would the country be better served with a leader who prioritizes vital matters over charming children’s antics?
In conclusion, Kamala Harris’s response to the children of Senator Kim handing her their homemade business cards and asking her to take the oath was troubling. Even if she finds it amusing, such a whimsical approach drives people to question whether Harris is able to maintain the grave demeanor and dedication necessary to warrant the position as Vice President of the United States of America.