LISTEN HERE:
Special Counsel Jack Smith, overseeing the criminal trial involving former President Donald Trump in Washington DC, has proposed a trial commencement date of January 2, 2024.
This timeline, as reported by Fox News, suggests the trial would conclude in four to six weeks, positioning it right before the Republican presidential primaries.
Smith emphasized the public’s constitutional right to a swift trial, especially in this high-profile case where the defendant, a former U.S. president, is accused of conspiratorial actions related to the 2020 presidential election.
Specifically, the allegations involve efforts to overturn the election results, obstruct the election’s certification, and invalidate citizens’ votes. Notably, this trial date is scheduled just a fortnight before the initial voting for the Republican presidential nomination in Iowa.
Special Counsel Jack Smith, overseeing the criminal trial involving former President Donald Trump in Washington DC, has proposed a trial commencement date of January 2, 2024.
This timeline, as reported by Fox News, suggests the trial would conclude in four to six weeks, positioning it right before the Republican presidential primaries.
Smith emphasized the public’s constitutional right to a swift trial, especially in this high-profile case where the defendant, a former U.S. president, is accused of conspiratorial actions related to the 2020 presidential election.
Specifically, the allegations involve efforts to overturn the election results, obstruct the election’s certification, and invalidate citizens’ votes. Notably, this trial date is scheduled just a fortnight before the initial voting for the Republican presidential nomination in Iowa.
Reacting vehemently to the news, Trump took to his Truth Social platform stating, “Only a deluded individual would opt for such a date, right at the start of the New Year, which clearly interferes with the Iowa election.”
He argued that any trial on this matter, which he believes infringes on his First Amendment Rights, should take place after the elections.
In defiance of a potential court order requested by Smith that might restrict his public discourse concerning his January 6 case, Trump asserted his intention to speak on the issue. He claims the federal prosecutors are curbing his First Amendment rights.
NBC News further highlighted that Smith has requested District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to establish a protective order.
This would prevent Trump from revealing evidence shared with his defense team during the discovery phase. Trump’s legal team has not opposed the order outright but has asked for a more lenient version to safeguard Trump’s rights.
In a recent rally in Windham, N.H., Trump criticized both prosecutors and current President Joe Biden, emphasizing his right to speak on the matter and its impact on potential votes.
Beyond this, Trump confronts multiple indictments, including charges in a New York state court, a federal court in Florida, and potential state charges in Georgia, related to the 2020 state election.
Chutkan recently denied a request from Trump’s lawyers to reschedule a hearing on the possible protective order.
Although Smith’s team was ready to proceed this week, Trump’s lawyers cited scheduling conflicts due to simultaneous court proceedings in Florida.
Trump’s attorneys formally expressed their preference for the participation of both counsels, John Lauro and Todd Blanche, requesting the hearing be moved to the subsequent week to accommodate both.