It’s interesting to observe the first appearance of Hunter Biden, the son of President Biden, since his conveniently timed pardon by his father. He appeared rather nonchalant as he fetched his fast food order in Santa Barbara, California. His casual attire made it inconspicuous, but the media instantly spotted and recognized him. When probed by the press for a comment on his pardon, Hunter simply bypassed the question like it was trivial, further solidifying the lack of transparency that is often associated with the Biden administration.
Biden Junior’s outing comes shortly after his father’s dubious declaration that he would prevent his son from serving time for his criminal convictions. The charades began when Hunter was indicted on charges relating to illegal possession of a firearm and tax evasion, amounting to a whopping $1.4 million. Yet, these glaringly serious charges didn’t seem to deter his father from dismissing them as politically motivated.
It’s notable that President Biden rationalized his decision, claiming that the judicial actions against his son were not impartial but a strategic move by his political adversaries. Well, this shouldn’t come as a surprise considering how easy it has become for high-ranking officials to employ the political card to brush off their wrongdoings. Biden Sr. announced, ‘I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I assumed office, I pledged not to interfere with Justice Department’s judgments. However, I stand before you, having witnessed my son enduring biased prosecution.’
The President further defended his contentious decision, stating that Hunter’s unique treatment only emerged after his political rivals incited the charges to undermine his role and impede his candidacy. He claimed that a well-discussed plea deal, consented to by the Department of Justice, was disrupted in court, with his opponents celebrating their part in influencing the judicial system. But one can’t help but question the veracity of these statements, especially when it conveniently aids the President’s narrative.
Biden Sr., seemingly a victim of his warped ideology, tried to rationalize his decision by casting blame on so-called ‘raw politics’. He stated, ‘I have faith in our justice system, but I had to intervene, believing that this case was politically charged and led to a deviation from justice.’ He further declared that once he reached this conclusion over the weekend, there was no point in procrastinating the final resolution.
The President’s decision is a clear deviation from his previous affirmations, making us question his integrity and commitment to justice. He blatantly vowed previously that he would not grant his son a pardon, regardless of the situation. After the gun trial conviction, Biden Sr. even confirmed that he would respect the court’s decision. This sudden U-turn raises eyebrows about Biden’s steadfastness, raising doubts on his promises and claims.
On June 11, Hunter was convicted of lying about his drug addiction while procuring a firearm in 2018. He was convicted of three key charges – falsifying statements in a gun purchase, providing incorrect information required by a licensed firearm dealer, and illegal possession of a firearm being a user and an addict to controlled substances.
However, Hunter’s list of illegal affairs goes beyond just one trial. He had another string of accusations waiting for him pertaining to felony tax offenses and misdemeanor tax offenses. The charges were leveraged against him for failing to cough up at least $1.4 million in tax returns.
Let’s not overlook another critical aspect of Hunter Biden’s life – his long-drawn battle with substance abuse, an issue that cannot be ignored when discussing his legal problems. This was previously documented in his memoir, providing insight into his shocking substance abuse history. Understandably, this paints an unfavorable picture of him, especially when his criminal charges are related to his existing addiction problem.
Furthermore, as the jury selection for Hunter’s trial was about to commence in a Los Angeles federal court, he surprisingly pleaded guilty. Although this isn’t exactly shocking considering his previous track record, it still ignites curiosity as to why Hunter would confess guilt, especially given his father’s visible influence on the case.
To conclude, as much as fatherly love might have played a role in Biden’s decision to pardon his son, it is critical to question how justifiable and ethical it is for a President to interfere with the judiciary. The perception of bias and the lack of respect for independent legal processes can ultimately undermine the public’s trust in the judicial system and the presidency.
The incident involving Hunter Biden only reinforces the impression of the President’s abuse of power. Despite Hunter’s litany of charges, his father’s influence appears to afford him impunity. It is worth questioning whether this scenario would have unfolded differently if Hunter were a common citizen without political ties and clout.
Overall, the circumstances surrounding Hunter’s pardon seem shady at best and are indicative of potential discrepancies within the Biden administration. It highlights the need for a more transparent and accountable government, one that respects the judiciary’s independence and does not shield the guilty under the umbrella of political power.