in , , ,

House Republicans Probe Border Security Amid Immigration Surge

House Republicans Probe Border Security Amid Immigration Surge

The Judiciary Committee, currently steered by House Republicans, has initiated an inquiry into the management of immigration issues at the U.S.-Mexico border by the Biden administration.

The focus of the investigation includes the president’s command to dismantle the razor wire blockade installed by Texas authorities along the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Eagle Pass, Texas, questioning its legality.

Wrap your Christmas Gift the RIGHT Way this Season!

A missive penned to the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Alejandro Mayorkas, revealed that the committee believes the present scenario represents the most severe effects of illegal immigration our nation has ever faced, attributing the crisis to Biden administration policies.

After President Biden’s inauguration, statistics drawn by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) revealed encounters with 6.3 million unauthorized immigrants at the southwest border. As per the letter from the committee, DHS permitted 2.9 million of these immigrants to enter a variety of U.S. neighborhoods.

The document also signifies a notable increase in entries by unauthorized immigrants who managed to avoid Border Patrol intervention, numbering more than 1.7 million since January 20, 2021.

The correspondence authored by the committee emphasized the intensity of the situation in September, within a span of merely five days, Border Patrol reported encounters with over 45,000 illegal immigrants.

Have the best Christmas Gift this year with these SHot Glasses!

A significant instance was recorded on September 20 in Eagle Pass, where 4,000 unauthorized immigrants were intercepted. An extraordinary surge was noted on another day in late September when Border Patrol faced nearly 11,000 migrant confrontations at the southern border, establishing a strikingly high record in recent history.

To shed light on the preceding circumstances of September 20, the letter mentions a Mexican cargo train, loaded with international citizens, that traveled towards Piedras Negras, Mexico, located across the Rio Grande from Eagle Pass.

As the city anticipated the train’s arrival, they felt compelled to declare a state of emergency on the preceding day. In response to the crisis, CBP ended up curtailing the operations of two out of three international bridges leading to Eagle Pass – bridge 1 and the international rail bridge, a notable crossing point and the second-busiest rail intersection on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Decorate your Christmas Tree the RIGHT way this year!

Detailed in the document, the committee argues that by enforcing the closure of the train bridge, the Biden administration appears to have made processing unauthorized immigrants a priority.

This move, they argue, negatively impacted the American public by disrupting regular trade and travel activities through the international bridges. The Texas state and Eagle Pass local governments then undertook measures to discourage unauthorized immigrants by implementing Concertina wire and fencing structures.

Subsequently, the Biden administration made the decision to dismantle and remove these security enhancements, further escalating tensions.

The committee letter notes_with sorrow_ that even as unauthorized migrant encounters continued to surge in Eagle Pass, and while a lawsuit questioning the legitimacy of these actions was underway, the Biden administration pressed on with removing the border fence, boosting their removal operations through the use of an industrial-strength telehandler forklift.

Several days afterwards, a federal judge granted a temporary restraining order, largely suspending the administration’s actions of removing or tampering with the Concertina wire installed by the State of Texas. This order received substantial attention in the letter, foreshadowing subsequent demands of the committee.

As a consequence of these series of events, the committee seeks to obtain several pieces of documentation. The requests encapsulate information related both to the influx of international nationals heading towards the U.S. before September 20’s Eagle Pass events, and communications concerning the removal, interference, or dismantlement of the Concertina wire and fencing constructed by state and local governments along the southern border.

The committee’s missive also seeks clarity from Secretary Mayorkas on existing policies regarding interference or tampering with razor wire implementations created by local or state governments. They have expressed a desire for these policies, if existent, to be elucidated and for the identification of those who approved the dismantling of the concertina wire.

The official correspondence holds the signatures of Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who functions as the committee’s chairman as well as Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif. This significant development follows a period of less than a week since a federal court ordered the Biden government to cease the removal of razor wire along the southern border.

This temporary court instruction is the aftermath of a lawsuit presented by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. The dispute argued that federal officials had overstepped their authority, alleging that they had claimed the power to sabotage state property for the purpose of enabling the unauthorized entry and processing of immigrants.

The committee’s inquiry symbolizes a decisive turning point in the immigration debate, demonstrating their intent to shed light upon the multifaceted layers of an escalating issue. Their actions parallel the growing calls to safeguard national security, prioritize law and order, and maintain the normal flow of trade that is essential to the American economy.

Underlining these demands is a shared belief in the importance of maintaining open and honest dialogue, ensuring that national policy reflects the best interests of the American people, and retaining respect for state jurisdictions.

It remains to be seen how this unfolding investigation will impact the ongoing discussions and actions surrounding immigration and border security. Will the administration heed the calls from House Republican-led Judiciary Committee, or will there remain a divide over the best approach to managing the crisis at our southern borders?

These and more questions arise from the committee’s actions, prompting an earnest call for transparency, fairness, and a commitment to the principles that have steered our great nation throughout its history.


Like the products we sell? Sign up here for discounts!