In a recent interview, Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State, once again underscored her long-standing support for increased government regulation of social media platforms. She argued that without stricter moderation of online content, society risks losing “total control.” Clinton’s remarks are a call to ramp up efforts for more centralized control over the internet, aligning with a growing trend among the left to regulate speech and online activity.
Clinton highlighted recent legislative moves in blue states like California and New York, suggesting that a national effort is needed to control what she views as the “dangerous” spread of misinformation and harmful content online. According to Clinton, the lack of action by Congress is enabling threats to grow unchecked in the digital space, particularly for younger generations.
One of Clinton’s more controversial stances is her desire to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This law protects internet platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram from being held liable for the content users post. Clinton argues that these platforms are more than just neutral intermediaries and should be held accountable for failing to police content more aggressively.
Her call for more stringent moderation raises concerns about freedom of speech online. If these platforms become responsible for what users post, the risk of over-censorship looms large. Conservatives have long warned that such control would disproportionately affect right-leaning voices, who often face censorship on these platforms. Clinton, however, remains firm in her belief that more moderation is essential to maintaining “societal order.”
Additionally, Clinton showed support for an education-related initiative spearheaded by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, advocating for the removal of mobile phones from schools. She praised the move as a way to reduce distractions and improve students’ focus in the classroom. Though surprising to some, this initiative has reportedly shown positive results, with students becoming more engaged in both academic and social settings without the constant distraction of smartphones.
Clinton sees this as an opportunity to return to more traditional forms of social interaction. She emphasized that removing phones from schools not only enhances classroom learning but also fosters real-life connections, helping students build face-to-face communication skills that have waned in the digital age.
While Clinton’s rhetoric suggests that these measures are meant to protect children and society, many conservatives will see them as yet another push towards overreach by the government and Big Tech. The balancing act between ensuring safety and preserving freedom is delicate, and her proposals may come at the cost of limiting free speech and individual liberties.
In conclusion, Clinton’s approach is part of a broader trend on the left that seeks to increase government control over digital platforms. While some may view these efforts as necessary in a rapidly changing digital world, they raise significant concerns about the future of free speech and individual freedom in America. Conservatives should remain vigilant as these debates continue to shape the digital landscape.
View this post on Instagram