With the elections looming on the horizon, it’s hard to fathom how any contemplative citizen could be left undetermined regarding their voting preference. The allegations and rhetoric that have haunted this election cycle have brought fascinating descriptions of the candidates. While some may tout President Donald Trump as a threat to the democratic system, others could view Vice President Kamala Harris simply as unqualified for the role, propelled by a wave of identity politics rather than by the merit of her understanding of policy issues. Muting the cacophony of assertions, the crucial aspect at the heart of this election should be the clear differences in policy proposed by the candidates.
Let’s first dissect the issue of rising prices. Harris suggests her strategy would focus on retaliating against corporate excesses, launching a witch-hunt against those manipulating prices, and initiating price caps. In stark contrast, Trump prescribes a pragmatic approach leaning on the energy sector. He aims to reduce fuel prices by embracing fracking, kickstarting the Keystone Pipeline, and amplifying drilling in offshore and federal territories.
As for the contentious topic of undocumented immigrants, the candidates’ stances diverge considerably. Harris prefers to leave undocumented immigrants unchecked until their individual cases have been reviewed – a rather inefficient and lenient approach. Conversely, Trump takes a more definitive stance, emphasizing swift deportation of all illegal immigrants, prioritizing those who have committed felonies.
When we analyze the Israel-Hamas conflict, the difference can’t be starker. Harris favors bringing an immediate end to the conflict, endorsing negotiation with a terror organization like Hamas. Trump, standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel, believes in defeating Hamas and Hezbollah rightly before any negotiations can take place.
In the field of taxation, Harris plans to accumulate more from both corporate and individual taxpayers. On the other hand, Trump will not burden taxpayers further. His resolve is to make his tax cuts, that have spurred economic growth, permanent.
Pertaining to the sensitive issue of abortion, Harris exhibits a rigidly pro-choice stance. Trump, on the other hand, wisely proposes to delegate the control over abortion laws back to individual states, underscoring his recognition of states’ rights.
On the subject of education, Harris finds it fitting to prioritize Washington bureaucrats and teachers’ unions above the unique needs of our children. In stark contrast, Trump maintains the position of disassembling the Department of Education, implying a less centralized approach.
Given that Harris gambled away four years without producing any significant improvements to our major issues, the choice between the candidates is clearly apparent. It seems only natural for any informed citizen to lean toward the Trump/Vance ticket.
Recently, Vice President Kamala Harris made an intriguing statement during her D.C. campaign dialogue. Harris declared her intention to arrive with a to-do list if elected, implying a pressing concern for Trump’s alleged enemies list should he secure the election. It prompts two main considerations.
Firstly, why should Democrats tremble at the idea of prosecution unless their own actions don’t hold up under scrutiny? It’s logical to infer that fear generally arises when one knows they’ve committed wrongdoings. Secondly, Harris’s touted ‘to do’ list appears unsubstantial given her underwhelming record as Vice President. It’s peculiarly amusing to envision her to-do list consisting only of devising another to-do list.
A startling report from the House Judicial Committee unraveled the mystery surrounding the alleged Hunter Biden laptop. The FBI validified the laptop back in 2019 and expended considerable resources in 2020 preparing tech companies to label the impending laptop story as deceptive. Disturbingly, this suggests a strategic attempt to manipulate public perception and tamper with the integrity of the democratic process.
Shouldn’t this flagrant example of interference in the elections be subject to prosecution? What about the infamous letter signed by 52 CIA representatives and Secretary of State Antony Blinken claiming the laptop story to be false? It appears the list of potential law-breakers does not end here.
What about those dismissively ignoring congressional subpoenas or refusing to provide necessary information to oversight committees? And what about those who openly defy Supreme Court rulings, or the existing immigration laws of our nation? Does anyone still wonder why the thousands of Biden emails during his Vice Presidency haven’t seen the light of day?
The need to restore order is indisputable. If laws continue to be disregarded without consequence, we risk further spiraling into chaos. The current tumultuous state of affairs is a harsh testament to this reality. It is time we start holding law-breakers accountable.