The electoral race between Vice President Kamala Harris and the felon facing 34 charges was frankly devoid of real competition. From an outsider’s perspective, the felon continuously parodied our justice system while successfully dodging the repercussions of his actions, whereas Vice President Harris demonstrated a seemingly respectable demeanor, throwing the glaring differences between the two into sharp relief.
A significant portion of the American populace still hangs its head in shame when recalling the regrettable actions of the felon during his campaign stint. His offensive language and unbecoming behavior were a source of national embarrassment. Yet, the painful crossed fingers and gritted teeth reality of democracy is that we’re expected to honor the will of the majority, no matter how unpalatable the consequences may be.
Four years ago, the felon’s die-hard supporters went as far as to send an aggressive, violent mob to the Capitol building in a futile attempt to disrupt the democratic proceedings being led by then Vice President Mike Pence — a shocking act to anyone objectively observing the course of events. This was an absolute antithesis to the principles of democracy cherished by our forefathers.
Vice President Harris, adorned with a demeanor of calm and respectability, took the podium to announce the voting results that she was given. Patently, this moment was devoid of any disrespectful and divisive language. The Republicans cheered robustly on hearing their candidate’s tally prior to Harris announcing hers. It was discernible that she was seemingly indifferent toward these displays of enthusiasm.
Although Harris extended a polite greeting to Bruce Fischer, spouse of Senator Deb Fischer of Nebraska, the gesture was unfortunately not reciprocated in kind. For some critics, this depicted a scenario of unreciprocated courtesy and respect. While political differences can create discord, the failure to show common kindness may simply result in further division.
Amid these events, the felon seems to be vindictively orchestrating punitive actions against those who oppose him, while paradoxically promising pardons to the instigators of violence against public property and the democratic system. This glaringly points out the double standards practiced within these circles.
Senators Marco Rubio, Mitch McConnell, and Lindsey Graham initially took a strong stance against those who incited violence at the Capitol. However, their resolution wilted, over time, under the powerful influence exerted by the felon, forcing them into a state of silence and compliance.
It’s bewildering how, on that dreadful day, the felon appeared to empathetically address those who had taken law and order into their own hands, expressing his ‘affection’, before advising them to return home. It was a relief when Mike Pence, the former Vice President, displayed fortitude by declining to yield to threats, a stark contrast in responsibility in an already tense setup.
Post the insurrection, it’s alarming to witness the rise in power of numerous individuals who had once fueled the felon’s campaign of misinformation and confusion. One can’t help but experience a palpable sense of trepidity with the prospect of the felon returning to the White House.
It’s interesting to note that Vice President Harris’ actions have drawn parallels with those of another notable figure, former President Jimmy Carter. These comparisons, however, should be made with a grain of salt, as the political landscape has significantly evolved over the years.
Despite his profound admiration for the Vice President, Carter’s dedication to his late wife and his desire to live long enough to see Harris ascend to VP status has been widely interpreted as a poignant personal gesture, rather than a broad endorsement of her political prowess.
There’s a palpable sense of the historical significance surrounding Vice President Harris in her role, not only from her supporters but also from those who’ve challenged and critiqued her actions and policies.
Even as the nation grapples with these contemporary political issues, it’s hard to ignore the sense of camaraderie that has been exhibited among the people. However divisive our politics may become, it is paramount that we, the people, remember our bond as fellow citizens.
It’s vital that we continue to engage in constructive dialogue and fact-check claims before forming definitive opinions. Democracy thrives when its citizens are active, engaged, and holding their elected officials accountable.
It’s no small task to distill the essence of this tumultuous electoral race or the tumultuous tenure that has stretched in its aftermath. We continuously unravel the threads of this story, navigating through the complex maze that constitutes our political landscape.