LISTEN HERE:
An increasing subset of House Republicans are honing their arguments against the nation’s previous premier infectious disease authority, Dr. Anthony Fauci. Fauci, a name that has become ubiquitous due to his role during the pandemic, has been criticized for possibly providing misleading statements to Congress on multiple instances.
Notably, these allegations have been highlighted in a discussion between Benny Johnson, a conservative podcast host, and the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan. Johnson called into question the verity of Dr. Fauci’s previous claims regarding his knowledge of gain-of-function research funding.
Johnson continued raising concerns over Fauci’s statements in his conversation with Jordan. He asserted, ‘It can be confirmed beyond any reasonable doubt that he was not truthful.’ Johnson was keen to draw attention to specific legislative procedures that address false statements to Congress, citing 18 U.S. Code 1001 as a reference.
Johnson emphasized the seriousness of providing false information to Congress, which can incur a potential jail sentence. He suggested, not without a sense of irony, ‘In the annals of Congressional history, this appears to be a textbook example of an individual providing untruthful statements to Congress’.
Responding to Johnson’s inquiries, Jordan cast a skeptical look at the potential effectiveness of pursuing this case under the current administration. ‘It’s indeed possible to submit a referral, but to the Biden Justice Department?’ he pondered. While acknowledging the legislative avenues available to scrutinize such matters, Jordan expressed doubts over the likelihood of the sitting Democrats carrying it forward.
In addition, the Ohio Republican suggested an alternative approach that would be more beneficial than a referral. Jordan mused, ‘I am more inclined, if given the choice, to ask Dr. Fauci to return and face another set of questions here.’ He added that they were assembling evidence and pointed to the testimonies of other participants like Dr. Redfield and Chairman Wenstrup, whom he praised.
Simultaneously, Kentucky’s Republican Senator Rand Paul, who is also a qualified physician, made his feelings clear regarding Fauci’s retirement. Sharing a critical message directed at the ex-head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Paul underscored Fauci’s handling of the pandemic.
Asked if there was anything he would have tackled differently in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, Fauci replied that he wouldn’t change his approach. In response, Paul commented, ‘In all likelihood, there is no figure in public health who has made a more egregious misstep than Dr. Fauci.’ He went on to criticize the decision to fund gain-of-function research in authoritarian nations, leading to the creation of potent viruses.
Paul continued his criticism, arguing that such research may have led to a devastating leak, causing the untimely deaths of millions. His exchanges with Fauci during Senate oversight hearings on the pandemic response showcased the friction between the two figures, especially on Fauci’s recommendations and actions.
The Senator from Kentucky alleged that Fauci had misled Congress in December 2021. Eager to take this matter forward, he expressed intentions of informing the Biden Justice Department about the issue. However, in a subsequent Fox Business interview, Paul confessed that he held scant hope of the physician facing charges from Attorney General Merrick Garland under the present administration.
He further noted Garland’s reactions to parental protests at school board meetings as a possible indicator of his unwillingness to delve into Fauci’s Congressional testimony. ‘Despite our efforts in referring the case to the Department of Justice, Garland seems more interested in targeting parents airing grievances at school board meetings,’ said Paul.
The senator concluded his thoughts by expressing a strong view of Fauci’s debatable honesty, ‘I have diminished faith that Garland will objectively assess Fauci’s truthfulness,’ He made it clear in a succinct 12-word statement about the NIAID chief, ‘Fauci should face five years’ imprisonment for misleading Congress.’
Following suit, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) expressed his views on Fauci’s controversy at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held in Washington D.C. earlier this year. Cruz questioned the legitimacy of any system that didn’t hold Fauci to account, insinuating that under a rational system, he would face legal repercussions.
Cruz took a firm stand, ‘There is no one who has significantly tarnished trust in the medical and scientific community as much as Dr. Anthony Fauci, who seemed to impart misleading information to Americans willingly and shamelessly.’ He asserted the need for consequences for these actions.
In a potent finale, Cruz expressed his views plainly, ‘If our system operated on solid principles, he would be tried for committing perjury, and he would face legal consequences for misleading Congress.’ A glimpse into the changing tides of opinion surrounding Dr. Fauci’s role during the pandemic.