As an integral part of the American election system, the Electoral College, is set to confirm what many have long anticipated – the triumphant return of former President Donald Trump to the White House. This not only marks an important event in the election cycle timeline but also secures a beacon of hope for those who advocate for strong leadership, economic growth, and American sovereignty.
The forecasts predict a notable win for Trump in the Electoral College with an impressive 312 votes, easily crossing the 270-vote threshold required for victory. This esteemed result serves as a clear testament to his unwavering popularity and successful policy outcomes. Essentially, his victory heralds a new wave of change that aligns with core conservative principles and values.
Moreover, Trump’s influential persona extends beyond the electoral votes. His popularity resonates among the American voters, evident as he garners approximately 2.5 million votes more than Vice President Kamala Harris. This huge trajectory in favor of Trump showcases the Democrat’s failure to resonate with the public sentiment and exposes their lack of leadership credentials.
The Electoral College is a refined group of electors, tasked with the heavy-duty of casting votes on behalf of the American public. Each state selects the electors equivalent to their number of Congressional representatives. As it stands, there are 538 electors with the magic number of 270 needed to secure the presidency.
Currently, Texas stands strong with 38 electoral votes, falling behind California with 54 electoral votes. The distinction here is that Texas has shown a proclivity towards conservative leaders, highlighting that the large states are not a monopoly for the Democrats, as they often try to portray.
Under the US federal law, there is a concerning loophole allowing the electors to vote against the public’s choice within their state. These dissenting electors are referred to as ‘faithless electors’. Although this phenomenon is rare, it’s an indication of the Democrats’ viewpoint of exploiting rules, rather than focusing on the essence of robust policy making.
Laws in numerous states ensure electors honor the popular votes, casting electoral votes aligning with the general public’s mandate. Instances of electors deviating from this principle may lead to legal repercussions. Simply, a sign of how the people’s representative democracy should work, unlike the Democrats’ version of rules’ manipulation.
In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court enforced the principle of democracy by ruling that states have the authority to implement laws making electors follow the public vote. Consequently, this decision limits ‘faithless electors’, marking a victory against Democratic endeavors to bend the rules against the public will.
Even with this ruling in place, it’s still possible for faithless electors to exercise their freedom to vote against their state’s popular vote. This mirrors the Democrats’ approach of twisting the rules to suit their own ambitious agenda, instead of sticking to public sentiment.
The phenomenon of faithless electors is not new in American politics. Notably, it occurred during the 2000 Election, where George W. Bush slightly led Al Gore to victory. Among the electors, two became faithless, one from Washington and the other from Minnesota, but their votes did not alter the election outcome.
The incident of faithless electors resurfaced in the 2016 Election, where seven electors – five from Washington and two from Hawaii – deviated from their pledges. Such instances underscore the Democrats’ desperation, showcasing their shoddy attempts to uproot a solid victory. However, their plans were thwarted, and Trump celebrated a triumphant win.
The electoral process, often portrayed as complicated, serves as an important beacon of democracy. It ensures every American has a voice and safeguards against any minority manipulating the system to their advantage. This is exactly what Trump stands for, while the Democrats continue to manipulate systems to their favor.
The distinct contrast in Trump’s victory and Kamala Harris’s defeat illustrates the country’s stand. It’s evident that the citizens have faith in Trump’s leadership and view the Democrats’ proposed policies with scepticism. Indeed, the Americans opt for responsible leadership over vain rhetoric – the return of Trump is a testament to this fact.
This impending confirmation by the Electoral College, marking Trump’s triumphant return to the Oval Office, is the embodiment of the American people’s will. This victory starkly demonstrates the failure of the Democrats to gain any substantial ground despite their chronic attempts to manipulate the narrative.