LISTEN HERE:
Former President Trump and the 18 other defendants involved in the case are employing early defense strategies, creating challenges for the prosecution’s plan to hold a trial in the following month.
District Attorney Fani Willis aims to keep all co-defendants together for a trial starting on October 23, but various legal maneuvers are presenting significant obstacles. Legal experts have described Willis’s goal as extraordinarily ambitious.
Five defendants have already sought to have their cases transferred to federal court, while two have requested a speedy trial. Additionally, the majority of defendants are seeking to have their cases separated from the co-defendants, adding complexity to the proceedings.
Judge Scott McAfee of Fulton County Superior Court acknowledged the difficulties of trying such a large number of people simultaneously. The Washington Post reported his statement, noting that handling all 19 defendants within 40-something days appears unrealistic. Trump has attempted to postpone trial dates in all four of his criminal cases.
With the recent maneuvering, it is now possible that the trial may not take place until after the November 2024 election, despite the Georgia charges being ineligible for a presidential pardon. McAfee is expected to announce a trial date for Trump in Georgia soon, but the defense tactics are influencing the timetable.
An important development is that five of the co-defendants have filed motions to move the case from state court to federal court. If these removals are granted, the proceedings could be prolonged for months. McAfee has pointed out that these moves make it challenging to realize Willis’s goal of trying all the defendants in state court next month.
Moreover, the potential consequences of moving the case after the trial has begun were raised, including the issue of double jeopardy and the impact on the entire prosecution. Such concerns were voiced by McAfee at the recent hearing.
District Attorney Fani Willis is pushing for a “speedy trial” of all 19 co-defendants involved in the case against Trump. According to a report, Willis made an astonishing request to the court, urging the trial to begin on October 23.
While only two co-defendants have been identified so far, former Trump attorney Sydney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro, Willis argued that separating the defendants would be inappropriate.
MSNBC host Ali Velshi asked legal analyst Glenn Kirshner about the basis for arguing against severance in this case. Kirshner explained that prosecutors typically aim to keep all defendants in the same trial, while defendants often wish to be removed or severed from the joint trial.
“The empty chair defense” is a strategy often used by co-defendants when they are tried separately from their fellow co-defendants.
Kirshner, a former prosecutor, explained that one of defendant Chesebro’s potential defenses could involve blaming John Eastman, a constitutional scholar and law school Dean, who allegedly assured him that there was legal support for the alternate electors scheme.
Kirshner also predicted that other co-defendants would argue that they cannot adequately prepare for trial by October 23. This chorus of voices could potentially create reasonable doubt and result in a hung jury.
It will be interesting to see how Judge Scott McAfee responds to District Attorney Willis’s commitment to providing a speedy trial to all defendants. McAfee must consider the complexities and challenges posed by the defense strategies employed by the defendants. As the case progresses, the trial date and proceedings may be subject to further delays and complications. Both sides will continue to navigate the legal landscape in pursuit of their respective objectives, shaping the dynamics of this high-profile case.
The case involving former President Trump and 18 co-defendants continues to present unique challenges. District Attorney Fani Willis is determined to proceed with a trial starting on October 23, yet the defense’s early maneuvers are making this goal exceptionally ambitious.
Several defendants are seeking to transfer their cases to federal court, while others are requesting a swift trial or the separation of their cases from the co-defendants’. The sheer number of people involved makes managing the trial a formidable task, and Judge Scott McAfee has openly expressed doubts about the feasibility of trying all 19 defendants within a short timeframe.
Throughout all four of his criminal cases, former President Trump has been attempting to delay the trial dates. This recent legal maneuvering raises the possibility of a trial taking place after the November 2024 election, as the Georgia charges are not eligible for a presidential pardon.
The actions taken by the defense are currently influencing the trial’s timetable, and Judge McAfee is expected to soon announce the trial date for Trump’s case in Georgia. However, the complexities arising from the defense’s tactics may result in further delays and complications.
A critical aspect to note is that five of the co-defendants have filed motions to move the case from state to federal court, a move that could significantly prolong the legal proceedings. Judge McAfee has voiced concerns about this development as it challenges the feasibility of the trial occurring in state court next month.
The potential consequences of moving the case after the trial has commenced, including the implications of double jeopardy, have been raised and are being considered. These concerns were brought forth during the recent court hearing, further complicating the overall situation.
District Attorney Fani Willis is vigorously pursuing a “speedy trial” for all 19 co-defendants involved in the case against former President Trump. Willis is urging the court to commence the trial on October 23, highlighting the importance of keeping all defendants tried together.
This approach is not without controversy, as defendants often seek separation from co-defendants in cases of joint trials. Legal expert Glenn Kirshner explained the strategy known as ‘the empty chair defense,’ frequently employed by defendants tried separately to create doubt in the minds of jurors.
Kirshner predicted that several co-defendants will argue the inadequate preparation time, posing an intriguing development for Judge McAfee to consider.
It will be intriguing to observe Judge Scott McAfee’s response to District Attorney Willis’s demand for a quick trial for all co-defendants. The defense’s moves are introducing complexities and uncertainties that the court must navigate.
As the case progresses, it is likely that further delay and complications may arise. Both the prosecution and defense are actively working to achieve their objectives, shaping the outcome of this high-profile matter.
The case involving former President Trump and his 18 co-defendants continues to present unique challenges. District Attorney Fani Willis is determined to proceed with a trial starting on October 23, but the defense’s early strategies are proving to be deeply intricate.
Some defendants seek to transfer their cases to federal court, while others demand a speedy trial or the separation of their cases from the joint proceedings. The sheer number of co-defendants makes conducting a unified trial exceedingly difficult, prompting doubts from Judge Scott McAfee about the feasibility of meeting such an ambitious timetable.
Former President Trump has consistently sought to push back trial dates in all four of his criminal cases. The recent legal tactics employed by the defense raise the prospect of a trial taking place after the November 2024 election, despite the Georgia charges being beyond the reach of a presidential pardon.
These maneuvers by the defense are currently shaping the timeline for Trump’s trial in Georgia, and Judge McAfee is expected to announce a trial date soon. However, the defense’s strategies introduce complexities that may lead to further delays and complications as the case progresses.
It is essential to consider that five of the co-defendants have filed motions to have the case transferred from state court to federal court. Granting these requests could significantly extend the proceedings. Judge McAfee has acknowledged the challenges imposed by these moves, which make it difficult to fulfill District Attorney Willis’s plan to try all defendants in state court next month.
Furthermore, the repercussions of moving the case during an ongoing trial were raised, including the potential attachment of double jeopardy and the impact on the entire prosecution. These issues were raised and discussed by Judge McAfee during a recent hearing.
District Attorney Fani Willis is actively pursuing a “speedy trial” for all 19 co-defendants in the case against former President Trump. Willis has remarkably requested that the trial commence on October 23, emphasizing the importance of keeping all defendants together.
In court filings, Willis argued against severance, claiming it would be inappropriate. Legal analyst Glenn Kirshner explained that prosecutors generally prefer joint trials, while defendants frequently attempt to separate themselves from co-defendants. Kirshner highlighted the defense strategy of using the ’empty chair defense’ to introduce doubt, potentially leading to a hung jury.
It will be intriguing to witness Judge Scott McAfee’s response to District Attorney Willis’s commitment to provide a swift trial for all co-defendants. The defense’s tactics are adding complexity and uncertainty to the court proceedings. As the case progresses, further delays and complications may arise. Both the prosecution and defense will continue to maneuver in pursuit of their respective goals, shaping the trajectory of this high-profile case.
The case involving former President Trump and his 18 co-defendants presents unique challenges. District Attorney Fani Willis is determined to proceed with a trial starting on October 23, but the defense’s early maneuvers complicate this goal.
Several defendants are seeking to transfer their cases to federal court, while others are requesting a speedy trial or the separation of their cases from the co-defendants’. Judge Scott McAfee of Fulton County Superior Court recognizes the difficulties of handling such a large number of defendants simultaneously. Trying all 19 defendants within the allotted time frame may prove to be demanding.
