in Democrats

Cory Booker: DEI Makes Entities Hire The ‘Best Of The Best’

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)
Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images

In a recent interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) doubled down on his support for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, claiming that they help organizations “hire the best of the best.” According to Booker, DEI programs expand the search for talent by reaching out to minority-focused institutions like Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Hispanic-serving institutions.

Booker argued that many talented individuals from underrepresented backgrounds are often overlooked in traditional hiring practices. “DEI isn’t about lowering standards,” he said. “It’s about casting a wider net to find talent that otherwise wouldn’t be seen.”

Critics Sound the Alarm Over DEI’s Impact on Meritocracy

Despite Booker’s claims, DEI policies have faced significant criticism, particularly from those who argue that these initiatives undermine merit-based hiring and create unnecessary quotas. Opponents point out that prioritizing diversity metrics often comes at the expense of selecting the most qualified candidate, leading to potential inefficiencies within organizations.

“Organizations should be focused on hiring the most competent, capable individuals—period,” said Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR). “When you start introducing DEI mandates, you’re no longer hiring based purely on merit; you’re prioritizing optics and social outcomes.”

Conservatives have long warned that DEI programs often force businesses and institutions to lower their standards or prioritize identity over qualifications. Critics also note that DEI initiatives can create resentment among employees who feel promotions or job opportunities were awarded for reasons unrelated to job performance.

Real-World Consequences of DEI Policies

Businesses and public institutions that have aggressively implemented DEI policies have encountered mixed results. In some cases, productivity has declined, and internal divisions have risen as employees perceive favoritism or tokenism in hiring decisions. Companies like Bud Light, which leaned heavily into DEI-based marketing campaigns, learned the hard way when their efforts backfired, costing them market share and public trust.

A study by the Center for Organizational Studies found that organizations with heavy DEI mandates often experienced higher turnover rates and decreased morale, particularly among employees who believed their hard work was being overlooked in favor of meeting diversity benchmarks.

Balancing Inclusion and Excellence

Booker’s supporters argue that DEI programs can be effective when properly implemented, but critics emphasize that any effort to diversify the workplace must prioritize competence and results. “We want diversity naturally—through hard work and merit—not because the government or HR departments enforce quotas,” said a senior GOP official.

While Booker insists that DEI leads to “better outcomes,” the evidence remains mixed. Many argue that true success lies in merit-based hiring processes that reward talent, not identity. As organizations and government entities continue to grapple with this debate, the long-term impact of DEI policies remains a critical issue for American institutions.