in ,

Biden’s Baffling Release of Convicted Murderer Peltier Tramples on Justice

According to latest reports, controversial individual and lifelong jailbird Leonard Peltier, 80, recently gained release from Coleman penitentiary in Florida this past Tuesday. His departure went without public spectacle, as he skirted reporters and the inaptly jovial group of supporters that were present outside of the prison complex. The previously commuting President, Joe Biden, had surprisingly downgraded his life sentence to one of home confinement a couple of weeks before this release. This move had rightly provoked the ire of several law enforcement administrators nationwide due to Peltier’s involvement in atrocious events dating back to 1975.

Interestingly enough, Peltier is a known figure from the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, based in North Dakota. His plan, post-prison, centers around returning to his tribe residing in North Dakota, where they have facilitated preparations for him to settle back in and enjoy the comforts of home confinement. Even though Peltier has spent nearly fifty years within the confines of a prison cell, he vehemently denies having any role in the murder of two FBI agents back in 1975.

The unfortunate victims of this violent incident were FBI agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams. Their confrontation with Peltier occurred within the premises of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation situated in South Dakota. The former President Biden, it seems, has made a habit of alienating law enforcement officials with his actions. Despite Peltier’s clear conviction, there’s a disturbing number of Native Americans who consider him a political prisoner, suggesting he was wrongly condemned due to his activism related to tribal rights.

Nick Estes, a member of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe and also an academic figure in the domain of American Indian Studies at Minnesota University, articulated his views about Peltier symbolizing the plight of individuals who deal with racial profiling, cop brutality, and other forms of harassment. However, it is inappropriate and astounding to compare a convicted felon to the plight of those who suffer racial prejudice. While it is evident that such issues are serious and call for reform, associating them with a guilty murderer is a strange stance to take.

Adding fuel to an already confusing situation, Biden didn’t outright pardon Peltier but decided to commute his sentence to home confinement. His explanation was, Peltier had already served the bulk of his life within penitentiary walls, and his declining health was another consideration in the decision. However, this led to justifiable disapproval from those who believe in Peltier’s guilt, mainly considering Peltier’s past activism in AIM, an organization infamous for its fight for Native American treaty rights and tribal self-determination during the tumultuous 1960s.

Peltier’s conviction was directly tied to a scarring incident in 1975 on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation of South Dakota. This led to the tragic loss of two FBI agents. The official narrative from the FBI indicated that the agents, Coler and Williams, were tasked with legally serving arrest warrants linked to robbery and assault charges using a threatening weapon. Unlike Biden’s softened stance on Peltier, the prosecution at trial held firm, pushing that Peltier had killed both agents close up.

In a stark contrast to the scenario painted by the prosecution, Peltier admitted merely to firing his weapon from a distance in self-defense. He refused to accept that his bullets were the cause of agents’ deaths. Adding to the twist, a female witness who had initially testified to seeing Peltier commit the act later withdrew her claims, saying that her statements were coerced. Despite this, Peltier was served two counts of first-degree murder and handed two consequent life sentences.

Support for Peltier has unfortunately not waned over the years, with several questioning the fairness of his trial and the presented evidence against him. Surely, a system that allows a double-murderer to be released on account of ‘aged prison time’ and ‘poor health’ is reminiscent of a derision of the justice system…

Adversity also took hold of his early childhood, where he was taken from his family and placed in a boarding school. It’s noteworthy to mention that thousands of Indigenous children faced a similar predicament over decades, and in numerous cases, these children were victims of systematic abuse – physical, psychological, and sexual.

Although these struggles are undeniably horrific, and a dark part of history that needs to be acknowledged for effective rectification, it is imperative to separate crimes and tribulations from sympathy-driven decisions. Allowing a two-time murderer to live freely due to hardship earlier in life does not conform to the principles of justice…

Peltier had admitted to possessing and using a gun at the crime scene. Despite claiming it was self-defense, it does not erase the fact that two lives were taken that day, a fact that seems to have been glossed over in light of recent occurrences…

As the dust settles on Peltier’s release, we hope that law enforcement agencies, families, and friends of the victims find some closure and justice in seeing Peltier still under some form of restraint, albeit significantly more lenient…

As we move forward, we must question the oversights and potential conflicts of interest observable in this unfolding narrative. There must be more balanced considerations and multiple perspectives accounted for in such consequential decisions to commute sentences…

Joe Biden’s validation through commutation of Peltier’s sentence is a mind-boggling development. The American public deserves thorough explanation of such critical decisions that apparently contradict well-established judgments of the courts…

One can only hope that cases like Peltier serve as catalysts for reinforcing the credibility and impartiality of our justice system, which seems to have been overstepped by executive actions in this case…

As we ponder over the impact of this case, we reflect on the dangerous precedent it could set, potentially opening doors for other instances where justice might be distorted to fit into individual narratives of struggle and survival…