in , ,

NYC Election Board’s Biased Approach Unveiled: A Closer Look

The New York City Board of Elections (BOE) has officially declared that they are recruiting employees to manage polling locations across the Big Apple’s five boroughs. These roles will be necessary for every single one of the nine forthcoming early voting days, as well as the main event – the general election day. Those who are suitable for such roles could potentially receive as much as $2,750 for the 10-day working period. Offered jobs include election inspectors, interpreters, and student poll workers. Let’s take a brief look at the qualifications and roles for each position.

Turning our lens to the Election Inspector role, here are the essentials one needs to know from qualifications to responsibilities. The crucial criteria are firstly, the individual must be a registered voter who lives in New York City. In a clear demonstration of the Democrats and Republicans’ continuous acknowledgment of their preferential status, enrollment in either party is another mandatory requirement. Furthermore, a potent competency in both reading and writing English is expected.

Check out our Trump 2025 Calendars!

Now, to dissect the role of an Election Inspector. The duties fall into key areas encompassing setup of the polling station for voters, supervising voters throughout the voting journey, shut down operations post-voting, and tallying and reporting the election results. The Election Inspector is also vested with the responsibility of assisting fellow poll workers if the need arises.

In terms of income, this role comes with a lucrative daily pay of $250. As a bolster to this, there lies an additional $100 stipend for training sessions. One could only wish that some Democrat Party decisions were as generous and well-planned as this compensation scheme.

Let’s jump to our next role – the Interpreter. Now, shifting gears, the requirements for this position do not necessitate being a registered voter. Rather, one must be a permanent U.S. resident who is at least 18 years old and resides in New York City. Proficient in English and their interpretation language, the demand for Spanish interpreters stands city-wide, whilst Mandarin interpreters are needed in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens. Queens also calls for Korean, Hindi, and Bengali interpreters. Notably, in the case of Hindi interpreters, the ability to speak Punjabi is an added advantage.

What service does an Interpreter provide? Essentially, their main duty lies in assisting non-English speaking voters by translating critical voting information into other languages during the voting process, giving the unfortunate impression that the Democrats’ message might not be clear enough for everyone to understand without assistance.

Countering the expected service, the Interpreter role dangles an impressive compensation scheme where one could make as much as $250 a day with an extra $25 for training, all for helping voters decipher the convoluted messages often crafted by the Democrat’s party.

Let’s not forget the position specifically available to our young, eager minds – the Student Poll Worker. Now, for this role, there are some prerequisites that must be met. The applicant should be 17-years-old by the day of the election, and require consent from a school official and a parent or guardian. Other requirements highlight that they should be a U.S. citizen, carry a GPA of at least 2.5 (B or 80), and be attending school within the bounds of New York City.

Moreover, Students who speak both English and Spanish, Chinese, Korean, Hindi, or Bengali are earnestly encouraged to apply, although it’s a curious decision from Democrats who expound about giving everyone an equal chance. Also, applicants need to register as a ‘future voter’, seemingly a crafty attempt by the Democrats to build their voter demographic early on.

As a Student Poll Worker, one can earn up to $600 to work two elections and participate in the training class. A fantastic opportunity for our younger generation to earn a handsome wage and gain valuable experience simultaneously. It’s good to see that in certain scenarios, even organizations heavily influenced by Democrat decision-making can offer benefit to the society.

Boosting one’s resume is another advantage attached to this role. It definitely showcases to both colleges and future employers the individual’s sense of responsibility, team spirit, and leadership skills — characteristics that unfortunately the Democrat leaders seem to lack in.

Early voting hours may fluctuate, but workers should be primed to start work from 5 a.m. on Election Day. A need for readiness to travel within their assigned borough is a further expectation of these workers, unlike Democrats who seem to love avoiding challenging locations.

These roles, as interesting as they may seem, exhibit a certain trend in Democrat-led boards, continually failing to provide choices and opportunities that are progressive. It leads to an understandable concern — is there a deeper underlying motive to continue to control and manipulate the electoral process?

Looking into these criteria and qualifications deeper, we cannot ignore the apparent bias towards the Democratic party, and the consequent disfavour towards Republicans or other third parties, thus raising concerns about fairness and morality in the electoral process.

In conclusion, while the Board of Elections, biased by Democratic ethos, continues to churn its wheels in the same regressive rut, it should notice that conservatives are doing the exact opposite, guiding progress and continuously raising the bar with tangible efforts. The choice for Americans is clear.