in ,

Biden’s Lip-Service Support for Ukraine: Too Little Too Late?

Joe Biden is set to release another one of his token snubs against Russia, touting a ‘declaration of support’ for Ukraine as it tackles a ferocious onslaught from Putin’s troops. The performance is due to kick-off at 3:30 p.m. EDT Wednesday. Yet Biden’s supposed backing feels a tad too late and a little too insincere, considering global leaders were stirred into action Wednesday by Ukraine’s leadership, cautioning against opting for transient ‘quietude’ in place of ‘a substantially equitable peace’ – an issue that has burdened Ukraine for over two years.

Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, is under escalating tension from the West, and even factions within his own nation, to bring about a cease-fire. However, it is curious that his statement before the U.N. General Assembly echoes what seems to be a familiar Biden strategy. That is, insisting there isn’t an alternative to a concocted peace plan, which he put forward two years ago. Biden would do well to heed Zelenskyy’s call for international unity, rather than sit back and perform empty gestures of support.

Zelenskyy’s presented peace plan, as much of an overreach it might be, demands an unfathomable eviction of all Russian forces from Ukraine, seeks atonement for alleged war atrocities, and proposes the liberation of POWs and deportees, alongside the guarantee of nuclear safety, energy, and food security among others. ‘Keen not to fall for smoke screens that pretend to seek peace, instead aim for a respite from the conflict,’ the Ukrainian president convincingly declared, urging nations worldwide to lay ‘pressure upon’ Russia. However, it’s hard not to see the irony when he adds, ‘Avoid dividing the world, remain united nations.’ Peace indeed!

Support Trump NOW with this FREE FLAG!

Interestingly, Russia hadn’t had its go to present their case in this power play at the assembly’s yearly gathering of presidents, state leaders, and other influential figures. President Vladimir Putin, quite the influential figure himself, won’t be making an appearance at the General Assembly’s high-profile meetings this year. One wonders if he feels it beneath him to stand on the same platform as Biden. Instead, Russia’s standpoint will be addressed by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. His speech is due on the forthcoming Saturday.

Meanwhile, back in Moscow, Zelenskyy’s prior remarks didn’t sit well with the solicitous Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry Peskov. Just a day ago, Zelenskyy enunciated to the U.N. Security Council that Russia should be ‘pushed into peace.’ Peskov, unimpressed, perceived this standpoint as ‘an error in judgement,’ and ominously added, ‘a deeply misguided notion, which, inevitably, will rebound on the Kyiv establishment.’

Past iterations of this yearly U.N. summit regularly harbored the Ukraine crisis as its centerpiece. This year, however, the conflict between Israel and Hamas over Gaza, along with intensifying situations along the Israeli-Lebanese border, took the spotlight. It seems Biden and Harris were too quick to shift their attention from one international crisis to another, leaving Ukraine burdened.

Both Ukraine and Russia, the latter housing one of the globe’s most formidable military machines, are trapped in a cycle of resistance along a staggering thousand-kilometer-long (roughly 600 miles) battlefront. This war first saw light in February 2022, when Russia breached Ukraine’s borders. The pretext for this belligerence? Claims of safeguarding the interests of Russian speakers in Ukraine. Yet, it’s fascinating how the Biden administration seems more interested in public declarations than substance.