in ,

Harris’ Headphone Hijinks: A New Way to Dodge Media?

Kamala Harris
Senator Kamala Harris laughs during a forum at the annual NAACP convention in Detroit, Mich., July 24, 2019.(Rebecca Cook/Reuters)

Fox News recently raised questions about Kamala Harris’ methods of evasion, following an incident where she was seen wearing earbuds to seemingly avoid addressing media queries. The conservative broadcaster inferred that Harris had developed a new ‘strategy’ of wearing earbuds to elude any challenging questions or discussions.

In this peculiar incident, Kamala Harris came under the radar for using earbuds rather than engaging in open dialogues with reporters. The host, Todd Pirro, while interviewing Kaylee McGhee White from the conservative Steamboat Institute, pointed out how this tactic was proving to be controversial and had created a stir on social media platforms.

Pirro posed the question to White, intimating the significant responsibilities of the position Harris aspires to. He commented, ‘Can she really afford to shut out the world whenever a global leader like Xi or Putin poses a threat?’ The point raised about not being able to avoid confronting global issues simply by plugging in earbuds underlines Harris’ perceived inability to cope with high-pressure situations.

White concurred with Pirro’s sentiment, suggesting that Harris’ strategy seemed less like a temporary measure and more like an ingrained behavior to dodge confrontations. She opined that avoiding the press and circumventing tedious questions about her record didn’t serve any purpose for the American people who deserved clear and transparent answers.

Support Trump NOW with this FREE FLAG!

Harris, by consistently using her earbuds, according to White, has established a concerning precedent. In the context of this behavior, she questioned, ‘How are we, as voters, supposed to assess your potential and grant you the power to represent us in the White House?’ This question puts forth the fact that leaders cannot disregard the voters’ need for accountability and openness.

White and Pirro indicate that Kamala Harris seems to forget a fundamental aspect of the role she seeks – that of a public servant. They maintain she’s overlooking that her duty would be to serve and make decisions with the best interests of the American people in mind.

Pirro then introduced an insinuation that Harris might be using her earbuds as an escape to avoid discussing critical topics. He suggested that she could well be sidestepping the grim topic of the dead hostages in Gaza, hinting at a habit of evasion rather than confrontation.

According to Pirro’s analysis, this avoidance could be ‘another instance where America’s absence of strong leadership has endangered American lives.’ Given the gravity of the situation, one cannot afford to resort to tactics like plugging in earbuds to steer clear of tough conversations.

Critics have pointed out before that Harris seems out of sync with expectations. They note her preference for wired earbuds over Bluetooth devices, which are more commonly employed by officials of her stature. The apparent disconnect goes beyond technology and reflects a potential inability to connect with and understand the broader public’s needs.

Despite her unconventional choice of wired earbuds, the FBI recommends that public officials should use them over wireless headsets for security reasons. Yet, critics argue that this doesn’t vindicate Harris. Her pattern of habitual evasion raises questions about her suitability as a leader and her willingness to face the realities of public service.

Through this episode, the hosts and critics are attempting to underline that Harris is more focused on her immediate convenience than on understanding and dealing with the challenges of her position. They point out that this conduct does not bode well for the responsibility she seeks, that of representing the people in the White House.

Pirro, White, and others hope that these observations will prompt Harris to reconsider her approach, take responsibility, and engage more responsibly with the public and the media. They express a widespread belief that leadership involves dealing with difficult questions and situations, not avoiding them.

This incident, framed as both a pattern and a symbol of evasion, serves as a stark reminder for all political figures. It underlines the need for transparency, accountability, and the ability to confront challenging scenarios head-on instead of dodging them in service to the American people.