In a recent twist to her longstanding feud with former President Donald Trump, Rosie O’Donnell has ignited controversy by promoting a conspiracy theory regarding an assassination attempt on Trump. O’Donnell, known for her vocal criticism of Trump, suggested on social media that the injury Trump sustained during the attempt might not have been caused by a bullet, stirring a pot of speculation and debate across various platforms.
The incident in question occurred on July 13, when Trump was reportedly shot at during an event, with reports confirming that he was indeed hit in the ear. However, O’Donnell, leveraging her significant social media following, particularly on TikTok, expressed skepticism over the official narrative. “I don’t know what happened that day, but I don’t think it was a bullet that hit him,” she stated, hinting at alternative explanations like a fragment or another unspecified object.
Trump has WON, Claim your FREE Victory Shot Here!
This claim has not only reignited her personal feud with Trump but has also sparked a broader discussion on conspiracy theories in political discourse. Critics of O’Donnell’s theory point out that the FBI and other official sources have confirmed that Trump was indeed struck by a bullet, with no ambiguity in their reports. “There is absolutely no doubt in the FBI’s mind whether former President Trump was hit with a bullet and wounded in the ear,” an official statement clarified, directly contradicting O’Donnell’s assertions.
The spread of this conspiracy theory by O’Donnell has led to a mix of reactions. On platforms like X (formerly Twitter), users have expressed a range of sentiments from outright dismissal of O’Donnell’s claims to accusations of her suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), a term used to describe an irrational hatred for Trump. For instance, one user commented, “The TDS is strong in this one,” while another labeled it as an “#NutcaseAlert,” highlighting the polarization of opinions.
Despite the controversy, O’Donnell’s questioning of the event has not been without historical context. Conspiracy theories around political figures, especially those as divisive as Trump, are not new. However, this incident underscores the power of social media in amplifying such theories, regardless of their factual basis. O’Donnell’s platform allows her to reach millions, potentially influencing public perception, even if inadvertently, towards skepticism of established facts.
The debate around O’Donnell’s comments also touches on the broader issue of how public figures handle sensitive information and the responsibility that comes with their influence. While some argue that questioning official narratives is part of a healthy democratic process, others see it as irresponsible, especially when it involves events as serious as an assassination attempt.
As this story unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the complex relationship between celebrity, politics, and public discourse in the digital age. Rosie O’Donnell’s conspiracy theory, while dismissed by many as baseless, continues to fuel discussions on the nature of truth, the spread of misinformation, and the impact of personal feuds on political narratives.