in , ,

Gabbard Slams CNN’s Commentary on Trump’s Arlington Visit

Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard, who previously served as a US Representative for Hawaii’s Democratic Party, criticized CNN presenter Dana Bash during a recent Sunday interview. The critique was focused on the network’s broadcasting of a politically charged critique by Democrats regarding ex-President Donald Trump’s visit to Arlington National Cemetery. The visit itself was a mark of respect for the 13 American service members whose lives were tragically lost due to failures in the withdrawal operations from Afghanistan under the Biden-Harris administration.

The timing of Gabbard’s comments is significant, following a chain of claims from Vice President Harris targeted towards Donald Trump. Harris, despite never personally visiting the deceased soldiers or initiating communication with their grieving families, disparaged Trump’s act of honouring the fallen. The repercussions were swift, with deserved disapproval coming from Gold Star families who were disturbed by her inaccurate and unnecessarily politicized statements.

The CNN host pressed on the legality issue of filming at a specific location within the cemetery, a decision associated with the Trump campaign. This was despite having confirmation that all necessary permissions were secured before the event took place. It was, in fact, the very families of the fallen who had requested this filming; a move also previously undertaken by current President Joe Biden.

‘I’ve been across various war-related headlines, stories, and the erupting concerns people have been voicing’, confessed Gabbard, who has experience as a soldier herself with deployment to numerous global conflict zones. She also revealed a personal connection, with comrades buried in Section 60.

Support Trump NOW with this FREE FLAG!

In discussing the overarching public reactions, Gabbard expressed her shock at the severe lack of comprehensive nationwide recognition on the significant third commemoration day of the fallen 13 Gold Star families. Her concerns even more heightened by the outcry from these families who passionately feel their beloved have not been adequately treasured and recognized for their heroic efforts in national coverage.

In her words, ‘This is the true atrocity everyone should be up in arms about’. Her statement effectively diverting the attention from herself and directing the focus towards the blaring inequalities and lack of respect shown to the victims of the Afghan incident.

During this sobering remembrance event, which Gabbard herself attended, she witnessed an impressive display from Trump and his entourage. As per her account, it was an undoubtedly serious and respectful homage paid to all those lives lost during the sad event.

In conclusion, Gabbard calls out the mainstream media’s tendency to disproportionately focus on issues of political advantage rather than directing the spotlight on the matters that require urgent attention and action. Through this, she implores a reform in newsroom priorities towards stories that rightfully deserve attention and respect.

Aside from ardent political affiliations and sharp criticisms, the essence of her argument is about respecting the valiant fallen soldiers and their families who are bearing an immeasurable loss. This serves as a firm reminder to uphold the fundamental values of honor, dignity, and empathy for the invaluable sacrifice of the service members.

Highlighting the veterans’ need for fair comprehensive coverage is a matter of profound importance. Those who have served and made the ultimate sacrifice deserve to know that their bravery is not overshadowed by political maneuverings and media bias.

Irrespective of the political tug-of-war, there remains a significant underlying message here: our fallen heroes deserve recognition beyond short-term news cycles and political chess games. We should strive to provide robust, ever-present respect and coverage toward those who displayed extraordinary courage, living as a testament to our defensible freedoms.

The recognition of heroes should not be limited by a gatekeeper’s narrative or reduced to a political stick to beat opposition with. It should be acknowledged as a matter of national respect, regardless of the media distortion game.

In essence, respect for our military and their sacrifices must prevail over partisanship. The remembrance of their service and the price they paid far outweighs the temporal political gains. Let us not forget that these individuals, along with their families, carry a burden that we can hardly fathom, all for the promise of a peaceful and free nation.