LISTEN HERE:
During a recent speech he delivered at the California Republican Party’s fall convention, Former President Donald Trump expressed his skepticism towards the Biden administration’s push for electrified tanks and planes.
The U.S. Army’s plan to develop electric combat vehicles by 2050, as reported by The Washington Post, received criticism from the former president. In his speech, Trump questioned the feasibility of an all-electric army tank, stating that it falls short in terms of recharging capabilities and traveling distance.
Despite its shortcomings, Trump highlighted the administration’s aim to equip the military with environmentally friendly equipment for operations in enemy territories.
Jennifer Granholm, the Secretary of Energy, supported the Department of Defense’s initiative to replace non-tactical vehicles with electric ones by 2030. Trump, however, argued against the idea of applying electric technology to military tanks.
He emphasized the importance of power and endurance, suggesting that solely relying on electric power might compromise the performance of the tanks. Trump’s concerns hinged on the belief that the United States should prioritize effectiveness and capability in combat rather than solely focusing on environmental aspects.
During an exchange with Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, Granholm expressed her confidence in the military’s transition to electric vehicles, stating that it would enhance America’s energy security. Trump, on the other hand, raised doubts about this approach, particularly in relation to fighter jets.
He recalled a meeting in which he was presented with a supposedly environmentally friendly fighter jet that had a 15% decrease in effectiveness. Trump questioned the value of such a decrease, highlighting the importance of maintaining combat superiority in air operations.
Trump’s critique extended to the Biden administration’s truck regulations, which he believed could disrupt the American supply chain. While not delving into specific details, he expressed concern that new regulations targeting trucks might hinder the smooth flow of goods across the country.
Trump’s remarks highlighted his stance on the importance of economic efficiency and the potential consequences of overregulation.
Former President Donald Trump recently addressed the California Republican Party’s fall convention, where he lambasted the Biden administration’s efforts to introduce electric tanks and planes. Trump’s criticism centered on the feasibility of an all-electric army tank, questioning its rechargeability, limited range, and overall power.
Despite these concerns, he acknowledged the administration’s push for environmentally friendly equipment, particularly in combat missions. Trump’s speech emphasized the importance of superior performance and effectiveness in the military while balancing environmental considerations.
Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm, however, voiced her support for the Department of Defense’s goal of transitioning non-tactical vehicles to electric ones by 2030. Trump countered this argument, underscoring the significance of power and endurance in military tanks.
According to him, relying solely on electric technology might compromise the tanks’ capabilities. This highlights Trump’s assertion that military priorities should not be overshadowed by a singular focus on environmental concerns.
In a discussion with Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, Granholm remained confident in the military’s ability to adapt to electric vehicles, emphasizing the potential energy security benefits for the nation. Trump, on the other hand, challenged this notion, specifically addressing the use of electric technology in fighter jets.
He recounted a meeting during which he was presented with a supposedly environmentally friendly fighter jet that demonstrated a 15% decrease in effectiveness. Trump emphasized the need for maintaining a competitive advantage in air combat, underlining the potential consequences of compromising performance.
Continuing his critique, Trump targeted the Biden administration’s regulations regarding trucks, expressing apprehension over their potential to disrupt the American supply chain. Though Trump did not provide specific details, he warned of the potential consequences associated with regulating the trucking industry.
His remarks conveyed his belief in the importance of maintaining a smooth and efficient flow of goods across the country, alluding to his commitment to economic stability and growth.
During his recent appearance at the California Republican Party’s fall convention, Former President Donald Trump voiced his skepticism towards the Biden administration’s endorsement of electrified tanks and planes.
Trump’s address primarily focused on the limitations of an all-electric army tank, including challenges related to recharging, range, and overall strength. Despite these reservations, Trump acknowledged the administration’s intent to prioritize environmentally friendly military equipment, even during operations in hostile territories.
Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm stood behind the Department of Defense’s plan to transition non-tactical vehicles to electric vehicles by 2030. In response, Trump questioned the practicality of applying electric technology to tanks, highlighting the importance of power and endurance in combat situations.
He argued that a sole emphasis on electric power might compromise the tanks’ ability to perform effectively. Trump aimed to emphasize the significance of military capability and effectiveness while still addressing environmental concerns.
During an exchange with Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, Granholm expressed her support for the military’s transition to electric vehicles, emphasizing the potential benefits for America’s energy security. Trump, however, voiced his doubts about the viability of electric technology in fighter jets.
He recounted a meeting where he was introduced to a supposedly environmentally friendly fighter jet that displayed a 15% decrease in effectiveness. Trump underscored the importance of superiority in air combat, noting the potential consequences of reduced performance.
Trump further criticized the Biden administration’s new regulations targeting trucks, expressing his concerns regarding potential disruptions to the American supply chain.
Although he did not provide specific details, Trump highlighted the adverse consequences that these trucking regulations might have on the country’s efficient distribution of goods.
His comments reflected his commitment to preserving a robust and unhindered flow of products across the nation, underscoring his focus on economic stability.
Former President Donald Trump recently took the stage at the California Republican Party’s fall convention, where he voiced his skepticism about the Biden administration’s pursuit of electrified tanks and planes.
Trump’s main critique revolved around an all-electric army tank, questioning its recharging limitations, insufficient range, and lack of strength. Despite his concerns, Trump acknowledged the administration’s intention to equip the military with environmentally conscious equipment, even in hostile environments.
Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm stood behind the Department of Defense’s plan to transition non-tactical vehicles to electric vehicles by 2030. Trump, however, challenged the practicality of implementing electric technology in military tanks, emphasizing the significance of power and endurance in warfare.
He argued that solely relying on electric power might compromise the tanks’ ability to perform effectively. Trump aimed to strike a balance between military capabilities and environmental considerations.
During a conversation with Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, Granholm expressed her confidence in the military’s adoption of electric vehicles, highlighting potential benefits for the nation’s energy security.
Trump, on the other hand, expressed doubts about the feasibility of electric technology in fighter jets. He recalled a meeting where he was presented with a supposedly environmentally friendly fighter jet that exhibited a 15% decrease in effectiveness. Trump underscored the importance of maintaining superiority in aerial combat, pointing out the potential consequences of reduced performance.
Trump also directed criticism towards the Biden administration’s newly introduced truck regulations, expressing his concerns about potential disruptions to the American supply chain.
Although specifics were not mentioned, Trump warned against the adverse effects of excessive trucking regulations on the efficient movement of goods across the nation. His remarks demonstrated a commitment to preserving a seamless and unimpeded flow of products, highlighting his emphasis on economic stability.
During his recent appearance at the California Republican Party’s fall convention, Former President Donald Trump questioned the Biden administration’s endorsement of electric tanks and planes.
Trump focused on the challenges of an all-electric army tank, including limited recharging capabilities, inadequate range, and diminished power. Despite his reservations, Trump acknowledged the administration’s push for environmentally friendly military equipment, even in combat scenarios.
Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm expressed her support for the Department of Defense’s plan to transition non-tactical vehicles to electric vehicles by 2030. However, Trump expressed skepticism about implementing electric technology in tanks, emphasizing the significance of power and endurance in combat situations.
He argued that relying solely on electric power could compromise the tanks’ effectiveness. Trump aimed to convey the importance of military capability while considering environmental factors.
During a discussion with Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, Granholm voiced her confidence in the military’s transition to electric vehicles, highlighting the potential benefits for national energy security.
Trump challenged the feasibility of electric technology in fighter jets, recalling a meeting where he was presented with a supposedly environmentally friendly fighter jet that demonstrated a 15% decrease in effectiveness.
Trump emphasized the importance of maintaining superiority in aerial combat, citing the potential consequences of reduced performance.
Trump also took issue with the Biden administration’s truck regulations, expressing concerns about potential disruptions to the American supply chain.
While specifics were not provided, Trump cautioned against excessive regulations that could hinder the smooth flow of goods across the nation. His statements reflected his commitment to ensuring an efficient distribution system, underscoring his focus on economic stability.