in ,

Meadow’s and Other Allies May Flip on Trump in Georgia Case

LISTEN HERE:

Recent findings have brought to light a possible turn of events in Donald Trump’s legal battles in Georgia. Reports indicate that Trump’s allies, including former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, may be distancing themselves from the former president.

According to court records referenced in a Politico report, Meadows and other former allies are being characterized as part of a racketeering scheme to rig Georgia’s 2020 election. Meadows’ defense lawyer, Michael Francisco, highlighted Trump’s involvement in the infamous phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2, 2021.

Support Trump NOW with this FREE FLAG!

While Meadows’ speaking roles were limited, he never made a request to alter the vote totals. These revelations seemingly connect Meadows’ case with previous news surrounding the Mar-a-Lago IT director and attempts to erase security footage from the resort.

Politico suggests that this new information strengthens the argument against Trump, citing potential obstruction of justice and mishandling of classified information. However, court filings from David Shafer, Cathleen Latham, and Shawn Still claim they were following orders from Trump and his lawyers while attempting to tamper with Georgia’s election results.

Fulton County District Attorney is pushing for a speedy trial for all 19 defendants, including former Trump attorney Sydney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro. Willis, the District Attorney, has requested that the trial begins on October 23, arguing against separating the defendants into multiple trials.

When asked about the potential severance of co-defendants, MSNBC host Ali Velshi interviewed legal analyst Glenn Kirshner. Kirshner explained that prosecutors aim to keep all defendants in the same trial, as separating them could lead to the ’empty chair defense.’

This defense occurs when co-defendants claim someone else, who is absent from the trial, was the true mastermind behind the alleged scheme. Kirshner predicted that one of the defendants, such as Chesebro, might argue that John Eastman, a constitutional scholar, should be sitting in that empty chair to justify their actions.

The legal analyst noted that such arguments could create doubt among jurors, potentially leading to a hung jury and no decision.

Additionally, Kirshner anticipated that many co-defendants would argue not having enough time to prepare for the trial by October 23. The House Judiciary Committee, led by Republicans, is pressuring Democratic DA Willis to disclose more details about the prosecution of Trump.

These ongoing legal battles have certainly captured attention and are expected to unfold in the coming months. As the facts continue to emerge, it remains to be seen how the dynamics between Trump and his former allies will further develop.

In recent developments related to Donald Trump’s legal situation in Georgia, a report has shed light on a possible shift in the behaviors of his allies. According to court records cited in a Politico report, former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and others are being implicated in a racketeering scheme to manipulate Georgia’s 2020 election.

Michael Francisco, Meadows’ lawyer, highlighted Trump’s involvement in the highly-publicized phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2, 2021. However, Meadows did not request any alteration of vote totals during that call.

The report by Politico also linked Meadows’ case to a previous incident involving the Mar-a-Lago IT director and the removal of security footage from the resort.

Politico suggests that these unveiled connections bolster the argument against Trump regarding potential obstruction of justice and mishandling of classified information. However, court filings from David Shafer, Cathleen Latham, and Shawn Still assert that they were merely following orders from Trump and his legal team while attempting to tamper with Georgia’s election results.

The Fulton County District Attorney is determined to expedite the trial process for all 19 defendants, including former Trump attorney Sydney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro. In a bold move, Willis, the District Attorney, has requested that the trial commence on October 23 as she opposes the idea of separating the co-defendants into various trials.

During an interview with legal analyst Glenn Kirshner, MSNBC host Ali Velshi inquired about potential issues associated with separating co-defendants. Kirshner explained that prosecutors prefer to keep all defendants together to avoid the ’empty chair defense.’

This defense strategy occurs when co-defendants argue that an absent individual was the actual mastermind behind the alleged scheme.

Kirshner speculated that a defendant like Chesebro might invoke the name of John Eastman, a constitutional scholar and law school Dean, to fill the metaphorical empty chair, thus justifying their actions. Such arguments could cast doubt on the case and potentially lead to a hung jury.

Kirshner also predicted that several co-defendants would contest the trial date of October 23, claiming insufficient time for preparation. Meanwhile, the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee is exerting pressure on Democratic DA Willis to disclose more details regarding Trump’s prosecution.

These legal battles have attracted significant attention, and in the coming months, we will witness how the dynamics between Trump and his former allies unfold as more facts come to light.

In light of recent findings concerning Donald Trump’s legal battles in Georgia, a potential twist has emerged involving the actions of his allies. Court records mentioned in a Politico report indicate that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and others are now being implicated in a racketeering scheme to manipulate Georgia’s 2020 election.

Michael Francisco, an attorney representing Meadows, underscored Trump’s involvement in the controversial phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2, 2021. However, Meadows did not seek to alter the vote totals during that conversation.

This report also draws a connection between Meadows’ case and an earlier incident involving the Mar-a-Lago IT director and the erasure of security camera footage from the resort.

According to Politico, these connections strengthen the arguments against Trump, suggesting possible obstruction of justice and mishandling of classified information. Nevertheless, court filings from David Shafer, Cathleen Latham, and Shawn Still claim they were following instructions from Trump and his attorneys while attempting to manipulate Georgia’s election results.

The Fulton County District Attorney is pushing for a swift trial of all 19 co-defendants, which includes Sydney Powell, a former attorney for Trump, and Kenneth Chesebro. Defying expectations, the District Attorney, Willis, has requested that the trial begin on October 23 without separating the defendants into multiple trials.

In an interview with MSNBC, legal analyst Glenn Kirshner explained the rationale behind keeping co-defendants together in a trial. Prosecutors typically prefer this approach to avoid the ’empty chair defense,’ which occurs when co-defendants argue that someone absent from the trial was the actual mastermind behind the alleged wrongdoing.

Kirshner speculated that a defendant like Chesebro might introduce John Eastman, a constitutional scholar and law school Dean, to fill the theoretical empty chair and justify their actions. Such arguments could create doubt among jurors, potentially leading to a hung jury.

Kirshner also predicted that multiple co-defendants would challenge the October 23 trial date due to inadequate preparation time. Meanwhile, the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee is urging Democratic DA Willis to provide further details about the prosecution of Trump.

These ongoing legal battles have captured significant attention, and in the coming months, the evolving dynamics between Trump and his former allies will continue to unfold as more facts emerge.

Recent findings have raised intriguing possibilities regarding Donald Trump’s legal battles in Georgia—an unexpected twist involving the actions of his allies.

Court records mentioned in a Politico report point to potential involvement of former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and others in a racketeering scheme aimed at manipulating Georgia’s 2020 election.

Michael Francisco, the attorney representing Meadows, emphasized Trump’s role in the controversial phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2, 2021. However, Meadows did not request a change in vote totals during the call.

The report by Politico also links Meadows’ case to an earlier incident concerning the Mar-a-Lago IT director and the wiping of surveillance footage from the resort.

As Politico highlights, these connections strengthen arguments against Trump, suggesting allegations of obstructing justice and mishandling classified information.

However, court documents from David Shafer, Cathleen Latham, and Shawn Still claim that they were acting on orders from Trump and his lawyers while trying to manipulate Georgia’s election results.

The Fulton County District Attorney is pushing for a speedy trial for all 19 defendants, including former Trump attorney Sydney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro. Surprisingly, the District Attorney, Willis, has requested that the trial begins on October 23, opposing the idea of separating the co-defendants into multiple trials.

During an interview, MSNBC’s Ali Velshi asked legal analyst Glenn Kirshner about the implications of separating co-defendants.

Kirshner explained that prosecutors prefer keeping all defendants together to avoid the ’empty chair defense,’ a strategy where co-defendants claim that an absent person was the true mastermind behind the alleged scheme.

Kirshner suggested that a defendant like Chesebro might argue that John Eastman, a constitutional scholar and law school Dean, should occupy the empty chair to justify their actions. Such arguments could introduce doubt among jurors and potentially result in a hung jury.

Kirshner also predicted that numerous co-defendants would contest the trial date of October 23, citing inadequate time for preparation. Meanwhile, the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee is exerting pressure on Democratic DA Willis to disclose further details about Trump’s prosecution.

These ongoing legal battles have garnered significant attention, and in the following months, we can expect further developments in the dynamics between Trump and his former allies as more facts come to light.

In recent developments surrounding Donald Trump’s legal battles in Georgia, surprising revelations have emerged regarding the actions of his allies.

Court records highlighted in a Politico report suggest that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and others are now implicated in a racketeering scheme aimed at manipulating Georgia’s 2020 election.

Michael Francisco, Meadows’ attorney, emphasized Trump’s involvement in the controversial phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2, 2021. During the call, Meadows refrained from requesting vote total changes.

Politico’s report also links Meadows’ case to an earlier incident involving the Mar-a-Lago IT director and the removal of security camera footage from the resort.

Politico argues that these connections strengthen the case against Trump, pointing to possible instances of obstruction of justice and mishandling of classified information.

However, court filings from David Shafer, Cathleen Latham, and Shawn Still claim that they acted upon directives from Trump and his attorneys while attempting to manipulate Georgia’s election results.

The Fulton County District Attorney is striving for a swift trial involving all 19 defendants, including former Trump attorney Sydney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro. Surprisingly, the District Attorney, Willis, has requested that the trial commence on October 23, opposing the separation of defendants into multiple trials.

In an interview with MSNBC, legal analyst Glenn Kirshner shed light on the rationale behind keeping co-defendants together in a trial.

Prosecutors typically prefer this approach to avoid the ’empty chair defense,’ in which co-defendants argue that an absent individual was the true mastermind behind the alleged wrongdoing.

Kirshner hypothesized that a defendant like Chesebro might call on John Eastman, a constitutional scholar and law school Dean, to fill the vacant chair and justify their actions. These arguments could instill doubt among jurors, potentially leading to a hung jury.

Kirshner also predicted that several co-defendants would challenge the trial date of October 23, claiming insufficient time for adequate preparation.

Meanwhile, the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee is putting pressure on Democratic DA Willis to disclose further details about the prosecution of Trump.

These ongoing legal battles continue to captivate public attention, and in the coming months, the evolving dynamics between Trump and his former allies will unfold as more facts emerge.