LISTEN HERE:
In a recent interview, renowned talk show host Tucker Carlson engaged in a thought-provoking conversation with presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy (D), delving into the lesser-explored topic of biolabs situated in Ukraine.
This unexpected subject was raised by Carlson, who referenced a congressional hearing where Acting Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland disclosed the existence of American-owned biolabs in the war-torn nation. Carlson highlighted how any media outlet daring to report on these biolabs faced backlash before questioning Kennedy about the purpose of such facilities.
Kennedy’s response shed light on the United States’ pursuit of bioweapon development, utilizing cutting-edge synthetic biology, CRISPR technology, and genetic engineering techniques. He emphasized the disconcerting potential of these advancements, remarking, ‘It can make frightening, frightening stuff.’
Kennedy further revealed that post the infamous Patriot Act, the Pentagon invested considerable resources in bioweapon research, meticulously avoiding any infringement upon the Geneva Conventions. Eventually, this responsibility was transferred to Anthony Fauci and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), facilitating Fauci’s impressive 68 percent salary raise.
The Democratic candidate went on to elucidate how the development of a bioweapon necessitates a concurrent vaccine to contend with the ‘blowback’ that arises upon deployment.
These ‘gain-of-function’ scientists intensify the lethality of infectious diseases while ensuring immunity against counter treatments like antibiotics, a process Kennedy aptly described as ‘the inverse of medicine.’
Astonishingly, the United States employs a staggering 36,000 ‘death scientists’ working tirelessly to advance these bioweapons for potential wartime applications.
Kennedy’s statements may seem reminiscent of a page-turning dystopian novel, but the stark reality behind his words is undeniably unsettling. While history has witnessed the necessity to develop major weapons, such as the nuclear bomb, the current situation differs significantly.
Kennedy’s remarks shed light on why America shows such deep concern for the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. While any invasion is inherently problematic, the response to Ukraine’s predicament carries its own peculiar characteristics.
Whether or not the United States is prepared, the full story gradually unfolds, revealing the intricate details of this complex situation.
The discussion initiated by Carlson and continued by RFK provides a fresh perspective on the geopolitical landscape. By delving into the presence of biolabs in Ukraine, the conversation veers toward uncharted territory.
Kennedy’s revelations about the development of bioweapons using cutting-edge technologies push the boundaries of imagination, conjuring images of a world only found in science fiction novels.
It is alarming to comprehend that these assertions made by a prominent presidential candidate are, in fact, an unsettling reflection of our reality. The existence of 36,000 full-time ‘death scientists’ devoted to creating bioweapons for warfare adds another layer of concern to this disconcerting revelation.
The dichotomy between historical necessity and the current situation becomes all too apparent. The urgency to create major weapons, as seen in the development of the nuclear bomb, differs from the motivations driving the pursuit of bioweapons today.
Kennedy’s insights offer a glimpse into the underlying reasons behind America’s intense involvement in the Ukrainian conflict. While any invasion is concerning, the response to Ukraine’s struggle carries a distinctiveness that warrants closer examination. The unfolding narrative, shrouded in secrecy, gradually comes into focus, revealing a truth that may unnerve even the most prepared.
The unexpected turn in the conversation between Carlson and Kennedy reveals a facet of the geopolitical landscape that rarely sees the light of day. By addressing the existence of biolabs in Ukraine, an unsung aspect of global affairs emerges.
Ep. 16 RFK Jr. explains Ukraine, bio-labs, and who killed his uncle pic.twitter.com/RMr5VZVqSM
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) August 14, 2023
Kennedy’s disclosure regarding bioweapon development utilizing cutting-edge technologies pushes the boundaries of possibility, painting a grim picture that feels like it belongs within the pages of a science fiction masterpiece.
However, it is crucial to remember that these statements originate from a well-known presidential candidate, rendering them chillingly real. The employment of a colossal workforce of 36,000 ‘death scientists’ dedicated to crafting bioweapons specifically for warfare heightens the gravity of this deeply troubling revelation.
Kennedy’s intriguing statements amidst his discussion with Carlson open new avenues for understanding the intricate dynamics of global affairs. Resulting from their exploration into the presence of biolabs within Ukraine, the conversation transcends conventional boundaries.
The shocking proliferation of bioweaponry employing state-of-the-art technologies evokes visions of dystopian worlds typically found in the pages of science fiction.
However, these revelations stem from a significant presidential candidate, thus solidifying their disconcertingly realistic nature. The presence of an extensive workforce comprising 36,000 ‘death scientists,’ focused solely on creating bioweapons, adds yet another layer of grave concern to this alarming narrative.
The juxtaposition of historical necessity with current circumstances serves as a stark reminder of the divergence in motivations. Engaging in the creation of major weapons, such as the nuclear bomb, differs dramatically from the pursuit of bioweapons today.
Kennedy’s disclosure offers invaluable insights into the underlying reasons behind America’s unwavering focus on Ukraine amidst the conflict with Russia. Although any invasion raises valid concerns, the response to Ukraine’s predicament possesses an unequivocal uniqueness that merits deeper examination.
Despite the potential unpreparedness of the United States, the gradual unraveling of this complex tale paints a vivid picture that may send chills down the spine.
The conversation between Carlson and Kennedy takes an unexpected turn, shining a light on an unexplored facet of the global stage. The existence of biolabs in Ukraine, a topic seldom discussed, captures the attention of both interviewee and interviewer.
Kennedy’s revelations about bioweapon development, utilizing technologies at the forefront of scientific progress, evoke eerie imagery that would not be out of place in the pages of a dystopian novel. However, it is essential to remember that these assertions come directly from a prominent political figure, leaving no room for dismissal.
The disquieting reality of employing a staggering workforce of 36,000 ‘death scientists’ solely dedicated to crafting bioweapons for combat intensifies the severity of this disconcerting discovery.
Within the engaging dialogue between Carlson and Kennedy lies an exploration of a hitherto untrodden path in the realm of global politics. By probing the existence of biolabs tucked away in Ukraine, the conversation takes a surprising twist.
Kennedy’s startling disclosures concerning the development of bioweapons employing avant-garde methods transport the mind to realms reserved for imaginative works of literature. However, these revelations are far from fiction, as they originate from the lips of a prominent presidential candidate.
The existence of an extensive network of 36,000 dedicated ‘death scientists’ exclusively focused on producing bioweapons for potential warfare heightens the gravity of these unnerving revelations.
The contrast between historical requirements and present circumstances becomes evident with every passing moment. While major weapons, such as the nuclear bomb, may once have offered a semblance of necessity, the pursuit of bioweapons in our current landscape possesses an entirely different complexion.
Kennedy’s illuminating remarks provide a glimpse into the underlying motivations driving America’s unwavering attention toward the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. Although any form of invasion merits concern, the unique response to Ukraine’s predicament demands closer scrutiny.
As the complete narrative gradually unfurls, irrespective of the United States’ readiness, the chilling truth may spring forth to unsettle even the most composed.
The discussion initiated by Carlson and continued by RFK Jr. veers onto an uncharted course, revealing an unfamiliar aspect of the global stage. By delving into the presence of biolabs nestled within Ukraine, they unearth a lesser-discussed thread of the intricate geopolitical tapestry.
Kennedy’s revelations surrounding the development of bioweapons utilizing state-of-the-art techniques transport the mind to realms typically reserved for compelling works of speculative fiction.
However, it is of utmost importance to emphasize that these assertions were made by a renowned presidential candidate, underscoring their disconcerting veracity. The existence of a formidable workforce encompassing 36,000 ‘death scientists’ solely dedicated to shaping bioweapons amplifies the gravity of this profoundly unsettling revelation.
Kennedy’s words during his conversation with Carlson reveal a new dimension of global affairs, one rarely explored. Pulling back the curtains on the existence of biolabs within Ukraine, the discussion leads us down an intriguing path.
Kennedy’s astonishing accounts of bioweapon development utilizing cutting-edge methods push the boundaries of imagination, bringing to mind the chilling landscapes depicted in works of science fiction.
However, it is pivotal to remember that these statements originate from a prominent presidential candidate, transforming them from mere speculation into alarming reality.
The sheer number of 36,000 ‘death scientists’ employed for the sole purpose of devising bioweapons adds an additional layer of disquiet to this profoundly disturbing revelation.
Exploring the depths of international dynamics, the conversation between Carlson and Kennedy traverses uncharted territory. By shedding light on the existence of biolabs concealed within Ukraine, they bring to the forefront an often-neglected aspect of global dialogue.
Kennedy’s startling revelations regarding the development of bioweapons utilizing cutting-edge technologies paint a portrait that could be ripped from the pages of a dystopian thriller.
Though reminiscent of science fiction, it is vital to remember that these statements stem from a prominent presidential candidate, shattering the illusion and echoing a disconcerting reality.
The haunting truth of a vast workforce comprising 36,000 ‘death scientists’ dedicated to the pursuit of bioweapons adds yet another layer of gravity to this disquieting narrative.
The conversation initiated by Carlson and continued by RFK Jr. introduces an intriguing facet of international geopolitics. Venturing into the presence of biolabs within Ukraine, the dialogue uncovers a realm rarely discussed.
Kennedy’s revelations about the progression of bioweapons through the utilization of cutting-edge technologies transport us to a world only witnessed in captivating works of science fiction. Yet, these words are delivered by a prominent presidential candidate, lending an alarming realism to the discussion.
The staggering presence of 36,000 ‘death scientists’ devoted entirely to the development of bioweapons amplifies the gravity of this disconcerting revelation.
Delving into uncharted territory within global politics, the exchange between Carlson and Kennedy reveals an unexplored dimension. Their focus shifts toward the existence of biolabs tucked away within Ukraine, an aspect rarely addressed.
Kennedy’s captivating insights into the development of bioweapons employing state-of-the-art techniques evoke imagery commonly reserved for thought-provoking science fiction masterpieces.
However, these revelations bear the weight of reality, originating from the lips of a prominent presidential candidate. The sheer magnitude of a devoted workforce consisting of 36,000 ‘death scientists’ amplifies the unsettling nature of this revelation.
The conversation between Carlson and Kennedy takes a surprising twist, delving into a lesser-known aspect of global affairs. By addressing the presence of biolabs in Ukraine, they unearthe a hidden component of geopolitical dialogue.
Kennedy’s eye-opening revelations about the development of bioweapons employing cutting-edge technologies transport the audience to realms usually found in the pages of captivating science fiction.
However, these assertions stem from the mouth of a well-known presidential candidate, cementing their disconcertingly real-world implications. The scale of involvement, with 36,000 dedicated ‘death scientists’ working exclusively to advance these bioweapons for war, adds another layer of gravity to this alarming narrative.