LISTEN HERE:
The well-known internet personality, Andrew Tate, presently on house arrest in Romania facing various allegations, had a detailed discussion with Tucker Carlson. With his interview Tweet notching over 37 million views, it’s unclear the precise number who watched the entire engagement. Carlson starts the interview by asking viewers to form their own judgment on Tate.
This British-American social media figure and ex-kickboxer is dealing with charges ranging from two instances of rape to human trafficking and forming an illicit group for sexual exploitation.
December 2022 saw his arrest alongside his brother, Tristan Tate, leading to an almost three-month Romanian jail stay without formal charges before house arrest. Both Andrew and Tristan deny these allegations categorically. Here’s a recap of key points gleaned from the interview.
In reference to the charge levied upon him, Carlson initially inquired about Tate’s position. In a passionate denial, the 36-year-old stated his charges involved heading an organized criminal faction, which allegedly recruited women for TikTok video creation intending to siphon off the financial gain from the post views.
He was also accused of using what’s known as the ‘lover boy method’ for recruitment – flattering them into cooperation. Tate entertained the idea of his vindication suggesting the evidence against him was ‘flimsy’. He also strongly alluded but fell short of confirming a conspiracy centered on damaging his reputation.
Tate, while not leaning into outright conspiracy theories, did express a suspicion of his legal predicament being linked to his influencer status, positioning it as an attempt to besmirch his name.
He specifically linked the charges of sexual offences to a ‘typical weapon’ frequently used against men, alleging a changing public perception of such cases based on recent high-profile incidents of women found fabricating claims. He showed concern in the shifting narrative, ‘what scares me is, now that this overused tactic is falling short, I am unsure of what tactic will replace it.’
Expressions of his jail term were notably stark. Tate described his routine comprised of ‘watching walls, smoking, doing push-ups, reading the Quran.’ He mentioned phone calls to close ones were a way to keep abreast of the outside world developments and functioned as introspective moments.
Reflecting on his jail tenure, he voiced concerns about his impaired effectiveness and the sensation of helplessness in supporting his family during this time. Though such emotions troubled him, he mentioned finding solace in small acts like complimenting guards to uplift his own spirit.
About his emotional health under confinement, Carlson subtly inquired whether Tate teetered on the brink of depression or suicidal tendencies. Tate emphatically denied such inclinations and controversially denied believing in depression.
While acknowledging the importance of mental health and recognizing others can feel depressed, he contested the notion of depression, personally interpreting it as a blockage rendering him immune. Throughout the discourse, Tate repeatedly affirmed, ‘I am not suicidal’ in his discussions about his mental state and perceived threats.
Digressions from his personal plight lead him into a broader sociopolitical conversation. Addressing his views on masculinity, he contended a cultural movement in Western society is deliberately seeking to undermine manliness.
Drawing connections to criticisms he has voiced against the U.K. government in the past, he also tied the subject to disturbances observed in France. Moderating into a critique on immigration policies, he, alongside Carlson, insinuated the overall quality of nations like France and the U.K. suffered due to immigration influxes.
The talk focused on a perceived imbalance where a ‘native population of men’ is effectively neutered and indoctrinated against masculine traits. According to Tate’s narrative, this coupled with an import of ‘Third World men’ not subscribing to the ‘garbage’ ideas about masculinity and understanding a predator’s fierce tenacity as a survival mode, is a recipe for societal disaster.
‘On whose shoulders does the responsibility of safeguarding our nations fall? Surely not the police?’ questioned Tate.
Tate’s anecdote suggests that problematic migration into countries like Russia would likely not manifest behavioral issues as migrants might judge the situation and opt for ‘Hmm, not today.’
The conversation shifted toward the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. The complexity of war situations was debated, making clear it isn’t a simple ‘good vs. bad’ narrative. Both Tate and Carlson highlighted the censorship that belies not being strictly pro-Ukraine.
Tate’s surmise on U.S. involvement in the conflict was ‘since there’s no other plausible explanation, it must be for power or money.’ He questioned the role of Ukraine’s sovereignty in the matter. He advised focusing on the beneficiaries and discerning if the beneficiaries cared about the best interests of the American populace.